REVIEW 2 cited by
Improved Sparse Ising Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sparse Ising problems can be found in application areas such as logistics, condensed matter physics and training of deep Boltzmann networks, but can be very difficult to tackle with high efficiency and accuracy. This report presents new data demonstrating significantly higher performance on some longstanding benchmark problems with up to 20,000 variables. The data come from a new heuristic algorithm tested on the large sparse instances from the Gset benchmark suite. Relative to leading reported combinations of speed and accuracy (e.g., from Toshiba's Simulated Bifurcation Machine and Breakout Local Search), a proof-of-concept implementation reached targets 2-4 orders of magnitude faster. For two instances (G72 and G77) the new algorithm discovered a better solution than all previously reported values. Solution bitstrings confirming these two best solutions are provided. The data suggest exciting possibilities for pushing the sparse Ising performance frontier to potentially strengthen algorithm portfolios, AI toolkits and decision-making systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cosm: Collective Switched Motion for Fast and Accurate Sparse Ising Optimization
Cosm finds certified optimal cuts on Gset G72/G77/G81 and reduces best-known times-to-target on G61/G70 from hundreds of hours to 36–303 s via switched circular dynamics.
-
Performance report of heuristic algorithm that cracked the largest Gset Ising problems (G81 cut=14060)
A heuristic called Cosm achieves new best-known cuts on G72 (7008), G77 (9940), and G81 (14060), with reported speedups of 655x to 3560x over the previous best heuristic.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.