Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

FinanceMath: Knowledge-Intensive Math Reasoning in Finance Domains

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09797 v2 pith:GYUZJQ4Y submitted 2023-11-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgefinancemathllmsproblemsaccuracybenchmarkevaluatefinance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce FinanceMath, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' capabilities in solving knowledge-intensive math reasoning problems. Compared to prior works, this study features three core advancements. First, FinanceMath includes 1,200 problems with a hybrid of textual and tabular content. These problems require college-level knowledge in the finance domain for effective resolution. Second, we provide expert-annotated, detailed solution references in Python program format, ensuring a high-quality benchmark for LLM assessment. We also construct a finance-domain knowledge bank and investigate various knowledge integration strategies. Finally, we evaluate a wide spectrum of 44 LLMs with both Chain-of-Thought and Program-of-Thought prompting methods. Our experimental results reveal that the current best-performing system (i.e., GPT-4o) achieves only 60.9% accuracy using CoT prompting, leaving substantial room for improvement. Moreover, while augmenting LLMs with external knowledge can improve model performance (e.g., from 47.5% to 54.5% for Gemini-1.5-Pro), their accuracy remains significantly lower than the estimated human expert performance of 92%. We believe that FinanceMath can advance future research in the area of domain-specific knowledge retrieval and integration, particularly within the context of solving reasoning-intensive tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TableMoE: Neuro-Symbolic Routing for Structured Expert Reasoning in Multimodal Table Understanding

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TableMoE is a multimodal table model whose role-aware router sends table tokens to HTML, JSON, and code experts and reports state-of-the-art results on its own WildStruct benchmarks and MMMU-Table.

  2. SUCEA: Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval for Adversarial Fact-checking through Claim Decomposition and Editing

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SUCEA improves adversarial fact-checking by decomposing claims into atomic sub-claims, editing each sub-claim toward retrieved evidence, and re-retrieving before predicting the final label.

Pith tools