REVIEW 1 cited by
A Large-Scale Study on the Prevalence and Usage of TEE-based Features on Android
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In the realm of mobile security, where OS-based protections have proven insufficient against robust attackers, Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) have emerged as a hardware-based security technology. Despite the industry's persistence in advancing TEE technology, the impact on end users and developers remains largely unexplored. This study addresses this gap by conducting a large-scale analysis of TEE utilization in Android applications, focusing on the key areas of cryptography, digital rights management, biometric authentication, and secure dialogs. To facilitate our extensive analysis, we introduce Mobsec Analytika, a framework tailored for large-scale app examinations, which we make available to the research community. Through the analysis of 170,550 popular Android apps, our analysis illuminates the implementation of TEE-related features and their contextual usage. Our findings reveal that TEE features are predominantly utilized indirectly through third-party libraries, with only 6.7% of apps directly invoking the APIs. Moreover, the study reveals the underutilization of the recent TEE-based UI feature Protected Confirmation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
KeyDroid: A Large-Scale Analysis of Secure Key Storage in Android Apps
Most Android apps that collect sensitive data still rely on software key storage, and the first large-scale benchmarks show secure-element key operations are far too slow for anything but small payloads.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.