REVIEW 1 cited by
Understanding Segment Anything Model: SAM is Biased Towards Texture Rather than Shape
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In contrast to the human vision that mainly depends on the shape for recognizing the objects, deep image recognition models are widely known to be biased toward texture. Recently, Meta research team has released the first foundation model for image segmentation, termed segment anything model (SAM), which has attracted significant attention. In this work, we understand SAM from the perspective of texture \textit{v.s.} shape. Different from label-oriented recognition tasks, the SAM is trained to predict a mask for covering the object shape based on a promt. With this said, it seems self-evident that the SAM is biased towards shape. In this work, however, we reveal an interesting finding: the SAM is strongly biased towards texture-like dense features rather than shape. This intriguing finding is supported by a novel setup where we disentangle texture and shape cues and design texture-shape cue conflict for mask prediction.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Contour Field based Elliptical Shape Prior for the Segment Anything Model
Enforcing an elliptical contour field constraint inside SAM's decoder improves segmentation of elliptical objects such as optic cups, pupils, and cell nuclei.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.