pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.11658 · v6 · submitted 2023-11-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Nonequilibrium protection effect and spatial localization of noise-induced fluctuations: Quasi-one-dimensional driven lattice gas with partially penetrable obstacle

S.P. Lukyanets , O.V. Kliushnichenko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 06:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords nonequilibrium steady statedriven lattice gaslocal invariantsobstacle edgesnoise protectionspatial localizationshock wavesdomain wall
0
0 comments X

The pith

A nonequilibrium transition in a driven lattice gas generates local invariants that shield an obstacle-gas complex from external drive fluctuations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a transition in a quasi-one-dimensional driven lattice gas with a partially penetrable obstacle, where gas flow scattering produces a two-domain steady-state structure above critical parameters. Using a mean-field model on ring topology, it demonstrates that this transition creates local invariants tied to the obstacle and its nearest gas surroundings, referred to as obstacle edges. These invariants remain independent of main system parameters and function as local first integrals, enforcing particle conservation inside the obstacle together with temporal synchronization of edge states that forces total edge current to zero at every instant. The resulting insensitivity to driving-field noise in the overcritical domain coincides with strong spatial localization of fluctuations near the domain wall separating depleted and dense phases. Transitions between steady states occur through shock-wave generation, with sequential waves required subcritically but a single excitation sufficient overcritically, yielding complex versus real relaxation rates.

Core claim

The transition to the nonequilibrium steady state with two gas domains is accompanied by the emergence of local invariants for the obstacle-edges complex. These invariants are independent of system parameters and act as local first integrals, ensuring conservation of particles in the obstacle and temporal synchronization of edge states such that the total edge current vanishes at all times. Consequently, the complex is protected from fluctuations in the external driving field over the critical domain, with noise-induced fluctuations localized near the separating domain wall. Transitions between states occur via shock wave generation, with sequential waves in subcritical and single in overicr

What carries the argument

The obstacle-edges complex whose local invariants behave as first integrals independent of main parameters.

If this is right

  • The obstacle-gas complex becomes insensitive to noise of the external driving field within the overcritical domain.
  • Gas fluctuations induced by drive noise localize strongly near the domain wall separating depleted and dense phases.
  • Relaxation rates from one nonequilibrium steady state to another take complex values subcritically and real values overcritically.
  • Shock waves generated at the back side of the obstacle govern the mechanism of transitions, requiring many sequential excitations subcritically but only one overcritically.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The synchronization enforced by the invariants may extend to other driven systems containing fixed scatterers, producing analogous protection domains.
  • Numerical checks beyond the ring mean-field model could verify whether the parameter independence of the invariants survives in higher-dimensional or open-boundary geometries.
  • The change from complex to real relaxation rates across the transition supplies a concrete signature that could be sought in related lattice-gas or exclusion-process models.

Load-bearing premise

The mean-field model on ring topology produces invariants that remain truly independent of the main system parameters and act as local first integrals at least qualitatively.

What would settle it

Simulation or measurement that checks whether the total current through the obstacle edges remains exactly zero for all times in the overcritical regime would directly test the claimed invariance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2311.11658 by O.V. Kliushnichenko, S.P. Lukyanets.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Periodic chain with ring topology and the impurity site at the origin (below): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Behavior of density distribution (NESS pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Occupations of impurity site n0, its edges n±1, and their half-sum as a function of external field g. Above crit￾ical field gc, determining the phase transition to kink-profile NESS, quantities n0 and n−1 + n1 are no longer dependent on g. Here, ¯n = 0.3, U = 0.6, and L0 = 401. The results are obtained based on the numerical solution of mean-field equations (4)–(5) in the same way as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Upper row) Two-dimensional projections of the critical surface for the phase diagram given in ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Numerical illustration of the emergence of local in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time invariance of quantity n±k = n−k + n+k ≈ 1 against dynamic fluctuations of driving g within g > gc domain. External drive g(τ ) is governed by periodic random noise around the mean value g = 0.8 > gc as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The square root dispersion ⟨∆n 2 k⟩ 1/2 t = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic representation of g-noise-induced wall shifting approximation. lows P(n1) = 1 2 δ(n1 − n g+δg 1 ) + 1 2 δ(n1 − n g−δg 1 ), (38) where n g±δg 1 denotes steady-state values of n1 at the field g±δg. Far away from the domain wall and impurity site, the dispersion of induced fluctuations of concentration takes the form ⟨δn2 1 ⟩ = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Overcritical regime (within the domain g > gc) Numerically obtained γ for transitions |g = 0.7⟩ ⇄ |g = 0.9⟩. Generally, n1(νt) decays according to Eq. (45), where expo￾nential behavior is decomposed into a fast decay with γ ′ at initial times and a slower decay with γ ′′ at moderate times, see figure insets; for estimate on upper plot (solid line) b = 0.0025, α = 0.3. As a rough estimate, we can use domin… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Transition rate γ ′ (g, g′ ) (numerical) correspond￾ing to the fast-time part of relaxation from |g⟩ → |g ′ ⟩, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Schematic illustration of quasi-one-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Continuum representation for the ring, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider a nonequilibrium transition that leads to the formation of nonlinear steady-state structures due to the gas flow scattering on a partially penetrable obstacle. The resulting nonequilibrium steady state (NESS) corresponds to a two-domain gas structure attained at certain critical parameters. We use a simple mean-field model of the driven lattice gas with ring topology to demonstrate that this transition is accompanied by the emergence of local invariants related to a complex composed of the obstacle and its nearest gas surrounding, which we refer to as obstacle edges. These invariants are independent of the main system parameters and behave as local first integrals, at least qualitatively. As a result, the complex becomes insensitive to the noise of external driving field within the overcritical domain. The emerged invariants describe the conservation of the number of particles inside the obstacle and strong temporal synchronization or correlation of gas states at obstacle edges. Such synchronization guarantees the equality to zero of the total edge current at any time. The robustness against external drive fluctuations is shown to be accompanied by strong spatial localization of induced gas fluctuations near the domain wall separating the depleted and dense gas phases. Such a behavior can be associated with nonequilibrium protection effect and synchronization of edges. The transition rates between different NESSs are shown to be different. The relaxation rates from one NESS to another take complex and real values in the sub- and overcritical regimes, respectively. The mechanism of these transitions is governed by the generation of shock waves at the back side of the obstacle. In the subcritical regime, these solitary waves are generated sequentially many times, while only a single excitation is sufficient to rearrange the system state in the overcritical regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a nonequilibrium transition in a quasi-one-dimensional driven lattice gas with a partially penetrable obstacle. Using a mean-field model on ring topology, it reports that above a critical point a two-domain NESS forms, accompanied by local invariants at the obstacle edges: conservation of particle number inside the obstacle and exact cancellation of total edge current due to edge synchronization. These invariants are asserted to be independent of the main parameters and to render the obstacle complex insensitive to drive noise, with accompanying spatial localization of fluctuations near the domain wall and distinct relaxation rates (complex subcritical, real overcritical) governed by shock-wave generation.

Significance. If the mean-field derivation establishes that the reported invariants remain exactly constant and parameter-independent in the overcritical regime, the work would identify a concrete nonequilibrium protection mechanism arising from local synchronization. The mean-field ring model supplies an analytically tractable setting in which such invariants can be examined, and the predicted difference in relaxation spectra together with the localization of fluctuations constitute falsifiable signatures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and mean-field model] Abstract (paragraph beginning 'We use a simple mean-field model') and the mean-field analysis section: the central claim that the invariants (particle number inside the obstacle; zero total edge current) are independent of the main system parameters and act as local first integrals rests on the mean-field rate equations, yet no explicit rate equations, closure assumptions, or algebraic steps deriving constancy for arbitrary driving strength, permeability, or lattice size are supplied. Without these steps it cannot be verified whether the reported independence survives changes in the microscopic rates or is an artifact of the particular mean-field truncation.
  2. [Relaxation dynamics] Section on relaxation rates and shock-wave mechanism: the assertion that relaxation rates change from complex (subcritical) to real (overcritical) values and that a single shock suffices to rearrange the state is load-bearing for the distinction between regimes, but the manuscript provides no explicit linearization or eigenvalue calculation around the NESS that would confirm the character of the eigenvalues.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the invariants hold 'at least qualitatively'; a precise statement of what quantitative checks (e.g., parameter sweeps or comparison with stochastic simulations) are performed would clarify the scope of the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below and will revise the manuscript to supply the requested explicit derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and mean-field model] Abstract (paragraph beginning 'We use a simple mean-field model') and the mean-field analysis section: the central claim that the invariants (particle number inside the obstacle; zero total edge current) are independent of the main system parameters and act as local first integrals rests on the mean-field rate equations, yet no explicit rate equations, closure assumptions, or algebraic steps deriving constancy for arbitrary driving strength, permeability, or lattice size are supplied. Without these steps it cannot be verified whether the reported independence survives changes in the microscopic rates or is an artifact of the particular mean-field truncation.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not present the mean-field rate equations, closure assumptions, or algebraic derivations in sufficient detail. In the revised version we will add the full set of mean-field equations on the ring, state the mean-field closure explicitly, and supply the algebraic steps showing that particle number inside the obstacle is conserved and total edge current vanishes identically due to edge synchronization. These steps will be shown to hold for arbitrary driving strength, permeability, and lattice size within the overcritical regime, confirming the parameter independence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Relaxation dynamics] Section on relaxation rates and shock-wave mechanism: the assertion that relaxation rates change from complex (subcritical) to real (overcritical) values and that a single shock suffices to rearrange the state is load-bearing for the distinction between regimes, but the manuscript provides no explicit linearization or eigenvalue calculation around the NESS that would confirm the character of the eigenvalues.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript lacked the explicit linearization and eigenvalue analysis. In the revision we will include the Jacobian of the mean-field system linearized about the NESS, the resulting eigenvalue spectra, and the demonstration that eigenvalues change from complex (subcritical) to real (overcritical). We will also show how a single shock-wave excitation suffices to reach the new NESS overcritically while multiple sequential shocks are required subcritically. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: invariants presented as emerging from mean-field dynamics

full rationale

The abstract states that a simple mean-field model on ring topology is used to demonstrate emergence of local invariants (particle number inside obstacle; zero total edge current via edge synchronization) that are independent of main parameters and act as local first integrals at least qualitatively. No equations, algebraic reductions, or self-citations are quoted that would make these invariants equivalent to inputs by construction, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim retains independent content from the model dynamics and is not forced by definition or prior author results. This is the normal non-circular case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the mean-field closure for the driven lattice gas and on the numerical or analytic observation that certain edge quantities become independent of drive strength above criticality.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Mean-field approximation suffices to capture the steady-state structure and fluctuation localization
    Explicitly stated as 'simple mean-field model' in the abstract
invented entities (1)
  • local invariants at obstacle edges no independent evidence
    purpose: To enforce insensitivity to drive noise and zero total edge current
    Introduced as emergent quantities in the overcritical regime; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the model is given

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5846 in / 1219 out tokens · 26827 ms · 2026-05-24T06:14:56.052848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 147 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Taking into account that mean position kg+δg s < ⟨ks⟩ < k g−δg s , Fig

    are determined by the stationary value ng 1 at the field g. Taking into account that mean position kg+δg s < ⟨ks⟩ < k g−δg s , Fig. 9, we can roughly estimate the dispersion of fluctuations of site occupation nearby the characteristic position of domain wall, namely, at the site ⟨ks⟩. The distribution function for n⟨ks⟩ can be rep- resented as, see Fig. 9...

    work page

  2. [2]

    quasi-particle

    Here ν± g′ = ν(1 ± g′) and ng 1 is steady state of n1 corresponding to the field magnitude g. The numerical results, see Figs. 10 and 11, demonstrate two-stage relaxation mechanism for the transition ng 1 → ng′ 1 : the fast relaxation γ′ g,g ′ prevails for initial times, and slow one γ′′ g,g ′ does for long time scales, γ′ g,g ′ ≫ γ′′ g,g ′: |n1(t) − ng′ ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    under entanglement phase transition induced by the non-Hermitian skin effect. It is necessary to emphasize that magnitudes of damping rates γg,g ′ of inter-NESS transitions before ({g1, g′ 1} < g c) and after ( {g2, g′ 2} > g c) phase transi- tion can differ significantly so that γg1,g′ 1 ≪ γg2,g′

    work page

  4. [4]

    reservoir

    In the particular case γ′ (0.1),(0.3)/γ′ (0.7),(0.9) ∝ 10−4. This means strongly correlated behavior of the system with a domain structure above the critical point gc. Note that we can consider the g-field environment as a second “reservoir” for gas system in addition to the ther- mal bath that initiates usual particle diffusion. For exam- ple, when adsor...

    work page

  5. [5]

    mainly focus on the value of the deviation of time- and space-averaged (over all the bonds) current from its mean value based on the long time limit for large devia- tion function,7 and also describe the discontinuous change in scaling behavior of diffusive constant, as of order pa- rameter, at this nonequilibrium phase transition. In con- trast, we stay ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Urgent Aid for the Preservation of the Re- search Capabilities of Ukraine

    for adsorbed atoms on the anisotropic or stepped solid-state substrate. It would be interesting to consider a possibility for analogous system decomposition, bound- ary current synchronization, and protection effect in 2D and 3D, i.e., when the wake around a cluster of obstacles protects its internal state or internal dynamics against external fluctuation...

    work page

  7. [7]

    heavy” component, say α = 0, so that ν1 ij ≫ ν0 ij. For simplicity we assume that the “heavy

    The Langevin equation for nonequilibrium hopping system. We consider a periodic potential for particles, for example, a potential relief of solid state sub- strate for adsorbed atoms (adatoms). The potential relief forms the periodical lattice whose sites correspond to the potential relief minima. Adatoms spend most of time τl at the minima of relief and ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    In the present form, Eqs

    The local-equilibrium approximation. In the present form, Eqs. (A2), and (A5), we face into difficul- ties in description of fluctuation in such system. It is to 20 adequately introduce the fluctuations of site occupation numbers δˆni = ˆni − ⟨ˆni⟩, which are not small in general. Since the root-mean-square fluctuation of the concentra- tion of any minimu...

    work page

  9. [9]

    The mean field approximation

    Fluctuations near nonequilibrium steady states. The mean field approximation. Up to this point we do not specify the asymmetry of forward- backward particle jumps νij ̸= νji that is related to the form of potential relief. In particular, the asymmetry can be caused by an external field that induces parti- cle drag. In the case of an infinite system, drivi...

    work page

  10. [10]

    The quasi-one-dimensional driven lattice gas model on a ring with obstacle. We consider the par- ticular case of a lattice in the form of a narrow channel with longitudinal L∥ and transverse L⊥ sizes, so that 11 For interacting particles, such simple factorization is not applica- ble. The interparticle interaction usually exceeds kBT , and the correlation...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Fluctuations induced by external drive noise. This phenomenological approach does not specify the stochastic field which initiates the jumps of the par- ticles between different sites, and, as result, does non specify the form of the Langevin source in the terms of this field. Usually, the correlation function of Langevin source, is associated with therma...

    work page

  12. [12]

    For all the numerical calculations we use discrete-time version of Eq

    Numerical calculation. For all the numerical calculations we use discrete-time version of Eq. (A13): ni(τk) − ni(τk + ∆τ) = ∆τ (Ji−1,i − Ji,i+1) , (A16) with Ji,i+1 = ν+(τk)ni(1−ni+1−Ui+1)−ν−(τk)ni+1(1−ni−Ui), (A17) where ν± = 1 ± g(τk) and τk = νtk is dimensionless time. The steady-state solution of Eq. (A16) is obtained as a limit τk ≫ ∆τ (i.e., NESS at...

    work page

  13. [13]

    Shankar, A

    S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 380 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Bal, Topological protection of perturbed edge states, Commun

    G. Bal, Topological protection of perturbed edge states, Commun. Math. Sci. 17, 193 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)

    work page 1996

  16. [16]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invari- ants of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    L. E. F. Torres, Perspective on topological states of non- hermitian lattices, J. Phys. Mater. 3, 014002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-hermitian skin effect and chiral damping in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Mori and T

    T. Mori and T. Shirai, Resolving a discrepancy be- tween liouvillian gap and relaxation time in boundary- dissipated quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 230604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp, Topological framework for directional amplification in driven-dissipative cavity arrays, Nat. Commun. 11, 3149 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Entanglement phase transition induced by the non-hermitian skin ef- fect, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Garbe, Y

    L. Garbe, Y. Minoguchi, J. Huber, and P. Rabl, The bosonic skin effect: Boundary condensation in asym- metric transport, SciPost Phys. 16, 029 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Minoguchi, J

    Y. Minoguchi, J. Huber, L. Garbe, A. Gambassi, and P. Rabl, A unified interface model for dissipative trans- port of bosons and fermions (2023), arXiv:2311.10138 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    P. C. Cao, Y. Li, Y. G. Peng, M. Qi, W. X. Huang, P. Q. Li, and X. F. Zhu, Diffusive skin effect and topological heat funneling, Commun. Phys. 4, 230 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    H. Hu, S. Han, Y. Yang, D. Liu, H. Xue, G.-G. Liu, Z. Cheng, Q. J. Wang, B. Zhang, and Y. Luo, Observa- tion of topological edge states in thermal diffusion, Adv. Mater. 34, 2202257 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Zhang, T

    X. Zhang, T. Zhang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, A re- view on non-hermitian skin effect, Adv. Phys.: X 7, 2109431 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Liu, P.-C

    Y.-K. Liu, P.-C. Cao, M. Qi, Q.-K.-L. Huang, Y.- G. Peng, Y. Li, and X.-F. Zhu, Observation of non-hermitian skin effect in thermal diffusion (2023), arXiv:2308.08839 [physics.class-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Loehr, S

    J. Loehr, S. Diehl, C. Wiegand, and P. Zoller, Topo- logical protection of multiparticle dissipative transport, Nat. Commun. 7, 11745 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Dasbiswas, K

    K. Dasbiswas, K. K. Mandadapu, and S. Vaikun- tanathan, Topological localization in out-of-equilibrium dissipative systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E9031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Yoshida, S.-B

    T. Yoshida, S.-B. Zhang, T. Neupert, and N. Kawakami, Non-hermitian Mott skin effect (2023), arXiv:2309.14111 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    B. H. Kim, J.-H. Han, and M. J. Park, Collective non-hermitian skin effect: Point-gap topology and the doublon-holon excitations in non-reciprocal many-body systems (2023), arXiv:2309.07894 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Diehl, E

    S. Diehl, E. Rico, M. A. Baranov, and P. Zoller, Topol- ogy by dissipation in atomic quantum wires, Nat. Phys. 7, 971 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    S. I. Pekar, Local quantum states of electrons in an ideal ion crystal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 16, 341 (1946); L. D. Landau and S. I. Pekar, Effective mass of a polaron, ibid. 18, 419 (1948)

    work page 1946

  37. [37]

    Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Adv

    H. Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Adv. Phys.3, 325 (1954)

    work page 1954

  38. [38]

    Holstein, Studies of polaron motion: Part I

    T. Holstein, Studies of polaron motion: Part I. The molecular-crystal model, Ann. Phys. 8, 325 (1959)

    work page 1959

  39. [39]

    H. S. Frank and W.-Y. Wen, Ion-solvent interaction. structural aspects of ion-solvent interaction in aqueous solutions: a suggested picture of water structure, Dis- cuss. Faraday Soc. 24, 133 (1957)

    work page 1957

  40. [40]

    Burgess, Ions in Solution: Basic Principles of Chem- ical Interactions, 1st ed

    J. Burgess, Ions in Solution: Basic Principles of Chem- ical Interactions, 1st ed. (Woodhead Publishing, New York, 1999)

    work page 1999

  41. [41]

    B. I. Lev, S. B. Chernyshuk, P. M. Tomchuk, and H. Yokoyama, Symmetry breaking and interaction of colloidal particles in nematic liquid crystals, Phys. Rev. E 65, 021709 (2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    Foffano, J

    G. Foffano, J. S. Lintuvuori, A. Tiribocchi, and D. Marenduzzo, The dynamics of colloidal intrusions in liquid crystals: a simulation perspective, Liq. Crys. Rev. 2, 1 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Musevic, M

    I. Musevic, M. Skarabot, U. Tkalec, M. Ravnik, and S. Zumer, Two-dimensional nematic colloidal crystals self-assembled by topological defects, Science 313, 954 (2006)

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    Ohzono, K

    T. Ohzono, K. Katoh, C. Wang, A. Fukazawa, S. Ya- maguchi, and J.-I. Fukuda, Uncovering different states 26 of topological defects in schlieren textures of a nematic liquid crystal, Sci. Rep. 7, 16814 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Liu and J

    H. Liu and J. Sonner, Holographic systems far from equilibrium: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 016001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Sonner and B

    J. Sonner and B. Withers, Universal spatial structure of nonequilibrium steady states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161603 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Novak, J

    I. Novak, J. Sonner, and B. Withers, Overcoming ob- stacles in nonequilibrium holography, Phys. Rev. D 98, 086023 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Kundu and S

    A. Kundu and S. Kundu, Steady-state physics, effective temperature dynamics in holography, Phys. Rev. D 91, 046004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Khlebnikov, M

    S. Khlebnikov, M. Kruczenski, and G. Michalogiorgakis, Shock waves in strongly coupled plasmas, Phys. Rev. D 82, 125003 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Maass, M

    P. Maass, M. Dierl, and M. Gries, On phase transitions in biased diffusion of interacting particles, in Diffusive Spreading in Nature, Technology and Society (Springer International Publishing, 2023) pp. 153–175

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Schadschneider, D

    A. Schadschneider, D. Chowdhury, and K. Nishi- nari, Stochastic Transport in Complex Systems: from Molecules to Vehicles (Elsevier, New York, 2010)

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    Dzubiella, H

    J. Dzubiella, H. L¨ owen, and C. N. Likos, Depletion forces in nonequilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 248301 (2003)

    work page 2003

  53. [53]

    Wulfert, U

    R. Wulfert, U. Seifert, and T. Speck, Nonequilibrium de- pletion interactions in active microrheology, Soft Matter 13, 9093 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    O. V. Kliushnychenko and S. P. Lukyanets, Effects of gas interparticle interaction on dissipative wake- mediated forces, Phys. Rev. E 95, 012150 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    A. V. Ivlev, J. Bartnick, M. Heinen, C.-R. Du, V. Nosenko, and H. L¨ owen, Statistical mechanics where newton’s third law is broken, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011035 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    direction

    O. V. Kliushnychenko and S. P. Lukyanets, Effect of the blockage and concentration switching of the “direction” of the trace of an inclusion in a lattice gas, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 118, 976 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Saitou, Y

    Y. Saitou, Y. Nakamura, T. Kamimura, and O. Ishihara, Bow shock formation in a complex plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 065004 (2012)

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    Jaiswal, M

    S. Jaiswal, M. Schwabe, A. Sen, and P. Bandyopad- hyay, Experimental investigation of dynamical struc- tures formed due to a complex plasma flowing past an obstacle, Phys. Plasmas 25, 093703 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Jaiswal, P

    S. Jaiswal, P. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Sen, Experimen- tal observation of precursor solitons in a flowing complex plasma, Phys. Rev. E 93, 041201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Bandyopadhyay and A

    P. Bandyopadhyay and A. Sen, Driven nonlinear struc- tures in flowing dusty plasmas, Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 6, 28 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    V. N. Tsytovich and N. G. Gusein-zade, Nonlinear screening of dust grains and structurization of dusty plasma, Plasma Phys. Rep. 39, 515 (2013)

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    S. A. Janowski and J. L. Lebowitz, Finite size effects and shock fluctuations in the asymmetric exclusion process, Phys. Rev. A 45, 618 (1992)

    work page 1992

  63. [63]

    S. A. Janowsky and J. L. Lebowitz, Exact results for the asymmetric simple exclusion process with a blockage, J. Stat. Phys. 77, 35 (1994)

    work page 1994

  64. [64]

    Costin, J

    O. Costin, J. L. Lebowitz, E. R. Speer, and A. Troiani, The blockage problem, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sin. (N.S.) 8, 49 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    R. H. Ritchie and P. M. Echenique, The wake of charged particles in condensed matter, Philos. Mag. A 45, 347 (1982)

    work page 1982

  66. [66]

    R. H. Ritchie, W. Brandt, and P. M. Echenique, Wake potential of swift ions in solids, Phys. Rev. B 14, 4808 (1976)

    work page 1976

  67. [67]

    Pines, Collective energy losses in solids, Rev

    D. Pines, Collective energy losses in solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 28, 184 (1956)

    work page 1956

  68. [68]

    Pines and D

    D. Pines and D. Bohm, A collective description of elec- tron interactions: II. Collective vs individual particle aspects of the interactions, Phys. Rev. 85, 338 (1952)

    work page 1952

  69. [69]

    W. B. Thompson and J. Hubbard, Long-range forces and the diffusion coefficients of a plasma, Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 714 (1960)

    work page 1960

  70. [70]

    Rostoker, Fluctuations of a plasma (I), Nucl

    N. Rostoker, Fluctuations of a plasma (I), Nucl. Fusion 1, 101 (1961)

    work page 1961

  71. [71]

    K. t. Leung, Novel phases and finite-size scaling in two- species asymmetric diffusive processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2386 (1994)

    work page 1994

  72. [72]

    R. S. Hipolito, R. K. P. Zia, and B. Schmittmann, Ef- fects of differential mobility on biased diffusion of two species, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 4963 (2003)

    work page 2003

  73. [73]

    O. V. Kliushnychenko and S. P. Lukyanets, Effects of collectively induced scattering of gas stream by impurity ensembles: Shock-wave enhancement and disorder-stimulated nonlinear screening, Phys. Rev. E 98, 020101(R) (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Excep- tional topology of non-hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non- hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    G. M. Sch¨ utz, Exactly solvable models for many-body systems far from equilibrium, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , Vol. 19, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, London, 2000) pp. 1– 251

    work page 2000

  77. [77]

    P. H. Chavanis, The generalized stochastic smolu- chowski equation, Entropy 21, 1006 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Schmittmann and R

    B. Schmittmann and R. K. P. Zia, Statistical mechanics of driven diffusive systems, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , Vol. 17, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, London, 1995)

    work page 1995

  79. [79]

    Galanti, D

    M. Galanti, D. Fanelli, and F. Piazza, Macroscopic transport equations in many-body systems from micro- scopic exclusion processes in disordered media: a re- view, Front. Phys. (Lausanne) 4, 33 (2016)

    work page 2016

  80. [80]

    J. F. Gouyet, M. Plapp, W. Dieterich, and P. Maass, Description of far-from-equilibrium processes by mean- field lattice gas models, Adv. Phys. 52, 523 (2003)

    work page 2003

Showing first 80 references.