Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Surpassing GPT-4 Medical Coding with a Two-Stage Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.13735 v1 pith:TONP7GQO submitted 2023-11-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords codingapproachcodesevidencehighmedicalaccuracyclinical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) show potential for clinical applications, such as clinical decision support and trial recommendations. However, the GPT-4 LLM predicts an excessive number of ICD codes for medical coding tasks, leading to high recall but low precision. To tackle this challenge, we introduce LLM-codex, a two-stage approach to predict ICD codes that first generates evidence proposals using an LLM and then employs an LSTM-based verification stage. The LSTM learns from both the LLM's high recall and human expert's high precision, using a custom loss function. Our model is the only approach that simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art results in medical coding accuracy, accuracy on rare codes, and sentence-level evidence identification to support coding decisions without training on human-annotated evidence according to experiments on the MIMIC dataset.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. The Anatomy of Evidence: An Investigation Into Explainable ICD Coding

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An empirical study of the MDACE dataset and current explainable ICD coding models, introducing match measures and showing that supervised models align with human evidence in most test cases.

Pith tools