Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Robust Graph Neural Networks via Unbiased Aggregation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.14934 v2 pith:QK7ZOLJK submitted 2023-11-25 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords robustrobustnessestimationgnnsgraphunbiasedaggregationanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The adversarial robustness of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) has been questioned due to the false sense of security uncovered by strong adaptive attacks despite the existence of numerous defenses. In this work, we delve into the robustness analysis of representative robust GNNs and provide a unified robust estimation point of view to understand their robustness and limitations. Our novel analysis of estimation bias motivates the design of a robust and unbiased graph signal estimator. We then develop an efficient Quasi-Newton Iterative Reweighted Least Squares algorithm to solve the estimation problem, which is unfolded as robust unbiased aggregation layers in GNNs with theoretical guarantees. Our comprehensive experiments confirm the strong robustness of our proposed model under various scenarios, and the ablation study provides a deep understanding of its advantages. Our code is available at https://github.com/chris-hzc/RUNG.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Boosting Adversarial Robustness and Generalization with Structural Prior

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    EDLNets replace convolutions with unrolled elastic dictionary-learning layers and report improved AutoAttack robustness, e.g., 59.07% AA (l-infinity 8/255) vs 53.16% for HAT on CIFAR-10 ResNet-18.

Pith tools