REVIEW 2 cited by
GPT4Vis: What Can GPT-4 Do for Zero-shot Visual Recognition?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper does not present a novel method. Instead, it delves into an essential, yet must-know baseline in light of the latest advancements in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI): the utilization of GPT-4 for visual understanding. Our study centers on the evaluation of GPT-4's linguistic and visual capabilities in zero-shot visual recognition tasks: Firstly, we explore the potential of its generated rich textual descriptions across various categories to enhance recognition performance without any training. Secondly, we evaluate GPT-4's visual proficiency in directly recognizing diverse visual content. We conducted extensive experiments to systematically evaluate GPT-4's performance across images, videos, and point clouds, using 16 benchmark datasets to measure top-1 and top-5 accuracy. Our findings show that GPT-4, enhanced with rich linguistic descriptions, significantly improves zero-shot recognition, offering an average top-1 accuracy increase of 7% across all datasets. GPT-4 excels in visual recognition, outshining OpenAI-CLIP's ViT-L and rivaling EVA-CLIP's ViT-E, particularly in video datasets HMDB-51 and UCF-101, where it leads by 22% and 9%, respectively. We hope this research contributes valuable data points and experience for future studies. We release our code at https://github.com/whwu95/GPT4Vis.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Med-Banana: Learning Quality-Controlled Medical Image Editing from Success-and-Failure Trajectories
Med-Banana-50K is a dataset of ~88K AI-generated medical image edits (accepts and rejects) across 23 diseases, labeled by a single commercial LLM judge with minimal expert validation.
-
Prompt Engineering for Requirements Engineering: A Literature Review and Roadmap
The first roadmap-oriented systematic literature review of prompt engineering for requirements engineering analyzes 35 studies and proposes a hybrid taxonomy and research roadmap.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.