Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Valid Wald Inference with Many Weak Instruments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.15932 v1 pith:XBDTBTG4 submitted 2023-11-27 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords validprocedurestestenvironmentinferenceinstrumentaljivemany
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper proposes three novel test procedures that yield valid inference in an environment with many weak instrumental variables (MWIV). It is observed that the t statistic of the jackknife instrumental variable estimator (JIVE) has an asymptotic distribution that is identical to the two-stage-least squares (TSLS) t statistic in the just-identified environment. Consequently, test procedures that were valid for TSLS t are also valid for the JIVE t. Two such procedures, i.e., VtF and conditional Wald, are adapted directly. By exploiting a feature of MWIV environments, a third, more powerful, one-sided VtF-based test procedure can be obtained.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Empirical Comparison of Weak-IV-Robust Procedures in Just-Identified Models

    econ.EM 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Anderson-Rubin and tF procedures are compared on AER data and simulations, with Anderson-Rubin showing higher power and shorter confidence intervals in most specifications.

Pith tools