Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Status of Direct Determination of Solar Neutrino Fluxes after Borexino

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16226 v2 pith:AXWMSORJ submitted 2023-11-27 hep-ph astro-ph.SRhep-ex

M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia , Michele Maltoni , João Paulo Pinheiro , Aldo M. Serenelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.SRhep-ex
keywords solarfluxesneutrinoanalysisborexinomodelresultsaccounting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We determine the solar neutrino fluxes from the global analysis of the most up-to-date terrestrial and solar neutrino data including the final results of the three phases of Borexino. The analysis are performed in the framework of three-neutrino mixing with and without accounting for the solar luminosity constraint. We discuss the independence of the results on the input from the Gallium experiments. The determined fluxes are then compared with the predictions provided by the latest Standard Solar Models. We quantify the dependence of the model comparison with the assumptions about the normalization of the solar neutrino fluxes produced in the CNO-cycle as well as on the particular set of fluxes employed for the model testing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Solar Model Independent Constraints on the Sterile Neutrino Interpretation of the Gallium Anomaly

    hep-ph 2024-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A global analysis of solar and KamLAND neutrino data finds that the sterile-neutrino explanation of the gallium anomaly remains disfavored at about 3 sigma or higher under all reasonable modeling assumptions.

Pith tools