Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Inference for Low-rank Models without Estimating the Rank

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16440 v2 pith:CE4JW3KC submitted 2023-11-28 econ.EM stat.ME

Inference for Low-rank Models without Estimating the Rank

classification econ.EM stat.ME
keywords rankinferencelow-rankconfoundingfactorstrueapplicationsestimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This paper studies the inference about linear functionals of high-dimensional low-rank matrices. While most existing inference methods would require consistent estimation of the true rank, our procedure is robust to rank misspecification, making it a promising approach in applications where rank estimation can be unreliable. We estimate the low-rank spaces using pre-specified weighting matrices, known as diversified projections. A novel statistical insight is that, unlike the usual statistical wisdom that overfitting mainly introduces additional variances, the over-estimated low-rank space also gives rise to a non-negligible bias due to an implicit ridge-type regularization. We develop a new inference procedure and show that the central limit theorem holds as long as the pre-specified rank is no smaller than the true rank. In one of our applications, we study multiple testing with incomplete data in the presence of confounding factors and show that our method remains valid as long as the number of controlled confounding factors is at least as large as the true number, even when no confounding factors are present.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncertainty Quantification for Ranking with Heterogeneous Preferences

    stat.ME 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A debiased regularized estimator provides entrywise-accurate scores and uncertainty quantification for heterogeneous Bradley-Terry-Luce rankings.