REVIEW 1 cited by
A Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Translation Metrics on Dialects Without Standard Orthography
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
For sensible progress in natural language processing, it is important that we are aware of the limitations of the evaluation metrics we use. In this work, we evaluate how robust metrics are to non-standardized dialects, i.e. spelling differences in language varieties that do not have a standard orthography. To investigate this, we collect a dataset of human translations and human judgments for automatic machine translations from English to two Swiss German dialects. We further create a challenge set for dialect variation and benchmark existing metrics' performances. Our results show that existing metrics cannot reliably evaluate Swiss German text generation outputs, especially on segment level. We propose initial design adaptations that increase robustness in the face of non-standardized dialects, although there remains much room for further improvement. The dataset, code, and models are available here: https://github.com/textshuttle/dialect_eval
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Vuyko Mistral: Adapting LLMs for Low-Resource Dialectal Translation
The authors release a Hutsul-Ukrainian corpus and show LoRA-fine-tuned 7B models beat GPT-4o on automated and LLM-based metrics, but the evaluation is contaminated by overlapping training and test sources.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.