Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Translation Metrics on Dialects Without Standard Orthography

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16865 v1 pith:4AAFTRUC submitted 2023-11-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords metricsdialectsbenchmarkdatasetdialectevaluateexistingfurther
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

For sensible progress in natural language processing, it is important that we are aware of the limitations of the evaluation metrics we use. In this work, we evaluate how robust metrics are to non-standardized dialects, i.e. spelling differences in language varieties that do not have a standard orthography. To investigate this, we collect a dataset of human translations and human judgments for automatic machine translations from English to two Swiss German dialects. We further create a challenge set for dialect variation and benchmark existing metrics' performances. Our results show that existing metrics cannot reliably evaluate Swiss German text generation outputs, especially on segment level. We propose initial design adaptations that increase robustness in the face of non-standardized dialects, although there remains much room for further improvement. The dataset, code, and models are available here: https://github.com/textshuttle/dialect_eval

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Vuyko Mistral: Adapting LLMs for Low-Resource Dialectal Translation

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The authors release a Hutsul-Ukrainian corpus and show LoRA-fine-tuned 7B models beat GPT-4o on automated and LLM-based metrics, but the evaluation is contaminated by overlapping training and test sources.

Pith tools