Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Unsupervised Multimodal Deepfake Detection Using Intra- and Cross-Modal Inconsistencies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.17088 v2 pith:XTSY3L7M submitted 2023-11-28 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords deepfakemethodbecausedetectionmethodsvideosinconsistenciesunsupervised
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deepfake videos present an increasing threat to society with potentially negative impact on criminal justice, democracy, and personal safety and privacy. Meanwhile, detecting deepfakes, at scale, remains a very challenging task that often requires labeled training data from existing deepfake generation methods. Further, even the most accurate supervised deepfake detection methods do not generalize to deepfakes generated using new generation methods. In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised method for detecting deepfake videos by directly identifying intra-modal and cross-modal inconsistency between video segments. The fundamental hypothesis behind the proposed detection method is that motion or identity inconsistencies are inevitable in deepfake videos. We will mathematically and empirically support this hypothesis, and then proceed to constructing our method grounded in our theoretical analysis. Our proposed method outperforms prior state-of-the-art unsupervised deepfake detection methods on the challenging FakeAVCeleb dataset, and also has several additional advantages: it is scalable because it does not require pristine (real) samples for each identity during inference and therefore can apply to arbitrarily many identities, generalizable because it is trained only on real videos and therefore does not rely on a particular deepfake method, reliable because it does not rely on any likelihood estimation in high dimensions, and explainable because it can pinpoint the exact location of modality inconsistencies which are then verifiable by a human expert.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeepFake Doctor: Diagnosing and Treating Audio-Video Fake Detection

    cs.MM 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Proposes new cross-manipulation evaluation protocols for FakeAVCeleb and DeepSpeak v1, shows temporal jittering mitigates a leading-silence shortcut, and introduces the SIMBA baseline.

  2. From Prediction to Explanation: Multimodal, Explainable, and Interactive Deepfake Detection Framework for Non-Expert Users

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pipeline combining a deepfake classifier, Grad-CAM heatmaps, image captioning, and an LLM generates layered explanations of deepfake verdicts for non-expert users.

Pith tools