Pith. Sign in

RECORD

$Q_{bias}$ -- A Dataset on Media Bias in Search Queries and Query Suggestions

Information Retrieval · Submitted 29 Nov 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Additionally to this work we provided datasets and language models for biasing texts that allow further research on bias in online information search.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2311.17780 (version 1)
Pith IDB6CZ3YEQ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationFabian Haak, Philipp Schaer. "$Q_{bias}$ -- A Dataset on Media Bias in Search Queries and Query Suggestions." arXiv:2311.17780 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/B6CZ3YEQ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,498 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.08 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.13 · mentions code or data availability 0.89.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This publication describes the motivation and generation of $Q_{bias}$, a large dataset of Google and Bing search queries, a scraping tool and dataset for biased news articles, as well as language models for the investigation of bias in online search. Web search engines are a major factor and trusted source in information search, especially in the political domain. However, biased information can influence opinion formation and lead to biased opinions. To interact with search engines, users formulate search queries and interact with search query suggestions provided by the search engines. A lack of datasets on search queries inhibits research on the subject. We use $Q_{bias}$ to evaluate different approaches to fine-tuning transformer-based language models with the goal of producing models capable of biasing text with left and right political stance. Additionally to this work we provided datasets and language models for biasing texts that allow further research on bias in online information search.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This publication describes the motivation and generation of $Q_{bias}$, a large dataset of Google and Bing search queries, a scraping tool and dataset for biased news articles, as well as language models for the investigation of bias in online search. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.12 asserted 0.99
s1 Web search engines are a major factor and trusted source in information search, especially in the political domain. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 However, biased information can influence opinion formation and lead to biased opinions. background 1.00 0.05 0.05 asserted 0.57
s3 To interact with search engines, users formulate search queries and interact with search query suggestions provided by the search engines. background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s4 A lack of datasets on search queries inhibits research on the subject. gap 1.00 0.10 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 We use $Q_{bias}$ to evaluate different approaches to fine-tuning transformer-based language models with the goal of producing models capable of biasing text with left and right political stance. contribution 0.52 0.94 0.18 asserted 0.97
s6 Additionally to this work we provided datasets and language models for biasing texts that allow further research on bias in online information search. contribution 0.86 0.94 0.20 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: dataset or benchmark 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.68.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This publication describes the motivation and generation of $Q_{bias}$, a large dataset of Google and Bing search queries, a scraping tool and dataset for biased news articles, as well as language models for the investigation of bias in online search. Web search engines are a major factor and trusted source in information search, especially in the political domain. However, biased information can influence opinion formation and lead to biased opinions. To interact with search engines, users formulate search queries and interact with search query suggestions provided by the search engines. A lack of datasets on search queries inhibits research on the subject. We use $Q_{bias}$ to evaluate different approaches to fine-tuning transformer-based language models with the goal of producing models capable of biasing text with left and right political stance. Additionally to this work we provided datasets and language models for biasing texts that allow further research on bias in online information search.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Uses its data or values 1 paper

What it cites

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • With the goal of capturing biased language in pretrained language models and using the HuggingFace Transformers module [ref] , we fine-tune the base DistilBERT model, which was trained in Wikipedia articles and a large book dataset.[<https://huggingface.co/distilbert-base-uncased>] DistilBERT– [ref] was chosen as a base model since it has proven to perform well with comparably small datasets, performs better than BERT despite its smaller size [ref] , and for its aptness for adopting domain-specificity [ref] .

    DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter · Domain-Adopting DistilBERT · 0.97

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.