REVIEW 3 cited by
Pre-registration for Predictive Modeling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Amid rising concerns of reproducibility and generalizability in predictive modeling, we explore the possibility and potential benefits of introducing pre-registration to the field. Despite notable advancements in predictive modeling, spanning core machine learning tasks to various scientific applications, challenges such as overlooked contextual factors, data-dependent decision-making, and unintentional re-use of test data have raised questions about the integrity of results. To address these issues, we propose adapting pre-registration practices from explanatory modeling to predictive modeling. We discuss current best practices in predictive modeling and their limitations, introduce a lightweight pre-registration template, and present a qualitative study with machine learning researchers to gain insight into the effectiveness of pre-registration in preventing biased estimates and promoting more reliable research outcomes. We conclude by exploring the scope of problems that pre-registration can address in predictive modeling and acknowledging its limitations within this context.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Safety Under Scaffolding: How Evaluation Conditions Shape Measured Safety
Map-reduce scaffolding degrades measured safety mainly by stripping multiple-choice options (40–89% of the loss is format conversion); scaffold architecture explains only 0.4% of variance and composite safety scores h...
-
Measurement as Bricolage: Examining How Data Scientists Construct Target Variables for Predictive Modeling Tasks
Data scientists construct prediction targets through bricolage, applying five reformulation strategies (piggybacking, composing, swapping, bridging, refining) to balance five criteria: validity, simplicity, predictabi...
-
Not All Explanations for Deep Learning Phenomena Are Equally Valuable
A position paper arguing that narrow, puzzle-solving explanations of deep learning edge case phenomena are low-value, and that these phenomena should instead be used to stress-test broad explanatory theories.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.