pith. sign in

arxiv: 2312.01401 · v3 · submitted 2023-12-03 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum Simulation of Dissipative Energy Transfer via Noisy Quantum Computer

Chin-Yi Lin , Li-Chai Shih , Shin Sun , Yuan-Chung Cheng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum simulationdissipative dynamicsnoisy quantum computersexciton dimerHEOMopen quantum systemsenergy transfertransfer tensor method
0
0 comments X

The pith

Noisy few-qubit devices can simulate dissipative exciton transfer by treating hardware noise as a calibrated resource.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether noise on current quantum hardware can be turned into a useful tool for modeling energy transfer in open quantum systems instead of being suppressed. It encodes the single-excitation states of a biased exciton dimer into two qubits, runs a shallow Trotterized circuit for the coherent part, and inserts repeated noisy identity gates to produce effective dissipation. Short-time population trajectories measured on IBM hardware are compared to the hierarchical equations of motion reference, revealing that the effective dissipation strength varies approximately linearly with the number of noisy gates. Once a few HEOM runs calibrate that line, the quantum circuit can stand in for additional HEOM calculations at intermediate points within the same dimer family.

Core claim

Noisy few-qubit devices can act as calibrated phenomenological simulators of open-system dynamics and, within a restricted but experimentally relevant regime, can provide a practical surrogate for repeated HEOM-based modeling. On IBM quantum hardware the calibrated noisy circuit reproduces a broad range of dissipative trajectories, and the fitted HEOM parameters exhibit an approximately linear dependence on the noisy-gate frequency. This empirical relation enables an interpolation strategy in which a finite set of HEOM calculations calibrates the device so that the noisy circuit replaces further HEOM runs for intermediate parameter values in the same biased-dimer family.

What carries the argument

Repeated noisy identity operations inserted into a two-qubit Trotterized propagator that generate a tunable effective dissipative channel mapped linearly onto HEOM parameters.

If this is right

  • The noisy circuit can replace repeated HEOM fitting for intermediate parameter points inside the same biased-dimer family.
  • Short-time hardware data combined with the transfer tensor method extends the simulated window beyond circuit-depth limits in noiseless simulator tests.
  • A broad range of dissipative trajectories within the tested regime can be reproduced directly on the hardware once the linear map is calibrated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same calibration approach could be tested on other few-qubit encodings of open-system models to see whether the linear relation generalizes.
  • If the linearity persists for different dimer biases or additional sites, the method would reduce the number of full HEOM runs needed to scan parameter space.
  • Hardware noise could be deliberately engineered or selected to target specific non-Markovian features that are expensive to capture with classical methods.

Load-bearing premise

The effective dissipation produced by repeated noisy identity gates can be mapped onto the HEOM parameter space by an approximately linear relation that holds across the tested regime for the biased exciton dimer.

What would settle it

Running the circuit at a new noisy-gate frequency outside the calibration set and finding that the measured short-time populations deviate substantially from the HEOM trajectory predicted by the linear interpolation would falsify the surrogate claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2312.01401 by Chin-Yi Lin, Li-Chai Shih, Shin Sun, Yuan-Chung Cheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: General concepts of our research. We do quantum simulation via quantum computer to simulate an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Our quantum circuit is composed of two subcircuits. The first part is our dissipation circuit, which [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Post Processing. Blue line is the observed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a)M=3, (b)M=5, (c) M=10, where M is the trotter steps, which means we devide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Linear Trotter step 𝑀 = ⌈𝑡/0.4⌉. A linear M is a suitable choice, since we could make sure Δ𝑡 = 𝑡/𝑀 remain small. 4.2 Comparison with HEOM To verify our dynamics results calculated on quantum computer, we fitted them with dynamics calculate by the HEOM method to examine whether the curves we produce by quantum computer are close to some existing system. For dynamics generated by different 𝛿𝑄 on quantum com… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: These are the fitting curved of different noisy gate frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Linear relation between 𝛿𝑄 &𝜆𝐻 . Here, 𝛿𝑄 is the frequency of the identity gate and 𝜆𝐻 is system bath coupling strength in Druid-Lorentz Model 5 LONG-TERM DYNAMICS SIMULATION THROUGH TRANSFER TENSOR METHOD Although the short-term simulation went well, we find that it’s harder for quantum computer to do long-term dynamics simulation. As the time 𝑡 increased, due to the increasing Trotter steps 𝑀 = ⌈𝑡/0.4⌉, … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Blue line is the extended dynamics of a dynamics produce by quantum simulator with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Extended results comparing to HEOM. We can see that in most of the cases, TTM gives very accurate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Real device population result of starting simulation from 4 initial density matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison between HEOM method, real device simulation, and TTM extension on the short-term [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Apply (left) XX gate (right) XZXZ gates 100 times on a single qubit from different initial states (IBM-Q [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Apply XZXZZXZXZZ gates 100 times on a single qubit from different initial states (IBM-Q Jakarta) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study whether dissipative energy-transfer dynamics can be simulated on noisy near-term quantum hardware by treating device noise as a calibrated resource rather than purely as an error source. Focusing on a biased exciton dimer, we encode the single-excitation manifold into a two-qubit subspace and implement the coherent dynamics through a shallow Trotterized propagator, while repeated noisy identity operations provide an effective dissipative channel. We benchmark the resulting short-time population dynamics against the hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM), which serves as a numerically accurate reference for the corresponding open-system model. On IBM quantum hardware, the calibrated noisy circuit reproduces a broad range of dissipative trajectories in the tested regime, and the fitted HEOM parameters exhibit an approximately linear dependence on the noisy-gate frequency. This empirical relation enables a practically useful interpolation strategy: once calibrated by a finite set of HEOM calculations, the noisy circuit can replace repeated HEOM fitting for intermediate parameter points within the same biased-dimer family. To extend the dynamics beyond the circuit-depth limit, we combine the short-time quantum data with the transfer tensor method (TTM). In simulator studies, TTM accurately extends the dynamics well beyond the directly simulated window, whereas on real hardware its performance is limited by the instability of coherence-sensitive initial states. Our results show that noisy few-qubit devices can act as calibrated phenomenological simulators of open-system dynamics and, within a restricted but experimentally relevant regime, can provide a practical surrogate for repeated HEOM-based modeling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that noisy near-term quantum hardware can simulate dissipative energy-transfer dynamics in a biased exciton dimer by encoding the single-excitation manifold in a two-qubit subspace, implementing coherent evolution via shallow Trotterized propagators, and generating an effective dissipative channel through repeated noisy identity gates. Short-time population trajectories are benchmarked against HEOM on IBM hardware, with the observation that fitted HEOM parameters depend approximately linearly on noisy-gate frequency; this relation is proposed to enable an interpolation-based surrogate that replaces repeated HEOM calculations for intermediate points in the same dimer family. The short-time quantum data are further combined with the transfer-tensor method (TTM) to extend the dynamics beyond circuit-depth limits, with simulator studies succeeding while hardware results are limited by initial-state instability.

Significance. If the reported linearity is shown to be robust and generalizable, the work would establish a concrete route for treating hardware noise as a calibrated phenomenological resource rather than solely an error source, offering a practical surrogate for repeated HEOM runs in restricted but experimentally relevant regimes of open quantum systems. The explicit hardware demonstration on IBM devices, direct comparison with a numerically exact reference method, and the hybrid TTM extension constitute tangible strengths that could inform future noise-aware simulation strategies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / HEOM fitting results] Abstract and the section presenting the HEOM-parameter fitting: the claim that 'the fitted HEOM parameters exhibit an approximately linear dependence on the noisy-gate frequency' enabling an interpolation surrogate is load-bearing for the central practical-utility argument, yet the text supplies neither the number of calibration points, quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics (R² or residual norms), error bars on the fit, nor any held-out validation at intermediate frequencies. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the relation supports reliable interpolation or collapses under denser sampling.
  2. [Hardware experiments and interpolation] Section describing the hardware benchmarking and interpolation strategy: the effective dissipative channel is generated by repeated noisy identities whose mapping onto HEOM parameter space is asserted to be approximately linear, but no independent test (e.g., additional frequencies outside the calibration set or comparison with a different noise model) is reported to confirm that the linearity is not an artifact of post-hoc selection from the same noisy-circuit data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures and Methods] Figure captions and methods text should explicitly state the fitting protocol, number of Trotter steps, and any post-selection criteria used when extracting populations from hardware shots.
  2. [TTM extension] The TTM extension paragraph would benefit from a quantitative metric (e.g., fidelity or population deviation) comparing simulator versus hardware performance at the longest accessible times.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and for recognizing the potential of treating hardware noise as a calibrated resource. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to supply the requested quantitative details and validation tests.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / HEOM fitting results] Abstract and the section presenting the HEOM-parameter fitting: the claim that 'the fitted HEOM parameters exhibit an approximately linear dependence on the noisy-gate frequency' enabling an interpolation surrogate is load-bearing for the central practical-utility argument, yet the text supplies neither the number of calibration points, quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics (R² or residual norms), error bars on the fit, nor any held-out validation at intermediate frequencies. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the relation supports reliable interpolation or collapses under denser sampling.

    Authors: We agree that these statistical details are essential to substantiate the linearity claim and the proposed interpolation surrogate. The original manuscript presented the approximate linearity as an empirical observation from the hardware data without reporting the number of calibration points, fit metrics, error bars, or held-out validation. In the revised manuscript we will add these elements to the HEOM fitting section (and update the abstract accordingly), including the number of calibration frequencies used, R² and residual norms for the linear fits, error bars from repeated runs, and a held-out test at an intermediate frequency. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Hardware experiments and interpolation] Section describing the hardware benchmarking and interpolation strategy: the effective dissipative channel is generated by repeated noisy identities whose mapping onto HEOM parameter space is asserted to be approximately linear, but no independent test (e.g., additional frequencies outside the calibration set or comparison with a different noise model) is reported to confirm that the linearity is not an artifact of post-hoc selection from the same noisy-circuit data.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an independent test would strengthen the evidence that the observed linearity is not an artifact of the chosen calibration points. While the original experiments sampled multiple frequencies and observed consistent linear trends, no dedicated held-out frequency or alternative noise-model comparison was included. We will revise the hardware benchmarking section to incorporate an additional hardware run at a frequency outside the original set and compare the interpolated HEOM parameters against direct benchmarks, thereby providing the requested independent validation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical linearity reported as observation, not constructed by definition

full rationale

The paper reports that 'the fitted HEOM parameters exhibit an approximately linear dependence on the noisy-gate frequency' as an empirical finding from hardware runs benchmarked to HEOM. This observed relation is then noted to 'enable a practically useful interpolation strategy.' No step equates a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction (e.g., no parameter fitted to a subset then relabeled as an independent prediction of a closely related quantity). The linearity is presented as data-driven rather than assumed or self-referential. No self-citation load-bearing, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling appears in the abstract or described chain. The work is self-contained as an empirical calibration study against an external reference (HEOM), warranting score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on empirical calibration of noise-induced dissipation rather than first-principles derivation; the linear mapping is fitted to hardware data.

free parameters (1)
  • slope and intercept of HEOM-parameter vs. noisy-gate-frequency line
    Empirically fitted from hardware runs to support the interpolation surrogate.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Trotterized propagator with chosen step size accurately approximates coherent exciton dynamics
    Invoked when implementing the coherent part of the propagator.
  • domain assumption Accumulated noise from repeated identity gates produces an effective channel whose parameters map linearly onto the HEOM description of the biased dimer
    Central premise enabling the calibrated-resource framing and interpolation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5798 in / 1352 out tokens · 34690 ms · 2026-05-24T05:23:13.655078+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Efficient quantum simulation of open quantum system dynamics on noisy quantum computers, 2021

    Shin Sun, Li-Chai Shih, and Yuan-Chung Cheng. Efficient quantum simulation of open quantum system dynamics on noisy quantum computers, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Non-markovian dynamical maps: numerical processing of open quantum trajectories

    Javier Cerrillo and Jianshu Cao. Non-markovian dynamical maps: numerical processing of open quantum trajectories. Physical review letters, 112(11):110401, 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Quantum computation and quantum information

    Michael A Nielsen and Isaac L Chuang. Quantum computation and quantum information. Phys. Today, 54(2):60, 2001

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Universal simulation of markovian quantum dynamics

    Dave Bacon, Andrew M Childs, Isaac L Chuang, Julia Kempe, Debbie W Leung, and Xinlan Zhou. Universal simulation of markovian quantum dynamics. Physical Review A, 64(6):062302, 2001. Quantum Simulation of Dissipative Energy Transfer via Noisy Quantum Computer 15

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Quantum simulation

    Iulia M Georgescu, Sahel Ashhab, and Franco Nori. Quantum simulation. Reviews of Modern Physics , 86(1):153, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities

    Ehud Altman, Kenneth R Brown, Giuseppe Carleo, Lincoln D Carr, Eugene Demler, Cheng Chin, Brian DeMarco, Sophia E Economou, Mark A Eriksson, Kai-Mei C Fu, et al. Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities. PRX Quantum, 2(1):017003, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Introduction to quantum algorithms for physics and chemistry

    Man-Hong Yung, James D Whitfield, Sergio Boixo, David G Tempel, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Introduction to quantum algorithms for physics and chemistry. Quantum Information and Computation for Chemistry , pages 67–106, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies

    Peter JJ O’Malley, Ryan Babbush, Ian D Kivlichan, Jonathan Romero, Jarrod R McClean, Rami Barends, Julian Kelly, Pedram Roushan, Andrew Tranter, Nan Ding, et al. Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies. Physical Review X, 6(3):031007, 2016

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Computation of molecular spectra on a quantum processor with an error-resilient algorithm

    James I Colless, Vinay V Ramasesh, Dar Dahlen, Machiel S Blok, Mollie E Kimchi-Schwartz, Jarrod R McClean, Jonathan Carter, Wibe A de Jong, and Irfan Siddiqi. Computation of molecular spectra on a quantum processor with an error-resilient algorithm. Physical Review X, 8(1):011021, 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing

    Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P Olson, Matthias Degroote, Peter D Johnson, Mária Kieferová, Ian D Kivlichan, Tim Menke, Borja Peropadre, Nicolas PD Sawaya, et al. Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chemical reviews, 119(19):10856–10915, 2019

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Quantum computational chemistry

    Sam McArdle, Suguru Endo, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, Simon C Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan. Quantum computational chemistry. Reviews of Modern Physics , 92(1):015003, 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond

    John Preskill. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum, 2:79, 2018

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Noise-adaptive compiler mappings for noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers

    Prakash Murali, Jonathan M Baker, Ali Javadi-Abhari, Frederic T Chong, and Margaret Martonosi. Noise-adaptive compiler mappings for noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers. In Proceedings of the twenty-fourth international conference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems , pages 1015–1029, 2019

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Resilient quantum computation.Science, 279(5349):342–345, 1998

    Emanuel Knill, Raymond Laflamme, and Wojciech H Zurek. Resilient quantum computation.Science, 279(5349):342–345, 1998

    work page 1998

  15. [15]

    Correcting coherent errors with surface codes

    Sergey Bravyi, Matthias Englbrecht, Robert König, and Nolan Peard. Correcting coherent errors with surface codes. npj Quantum Information, 4(1):55, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    The theory of open quantum systems

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione. The theory of open quantum systems . Oxford University Press, USA, 2002

    work page 2002

  17. [17]

    Quantum dissipative systems

    Ulrich Weiss. Quantum dissipative systems. World Scientific, 2012

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Light harvesting in oxygenic photosynthesis: Structural biology meets spectroscopy

    Roberta Croce and Herbert van Amerongen. Light harvesting in oxygenic photosynthesis: Structural biology meets spectroscopy. Science, 369(6506):eaay2058, 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Vibronic mixing enables ultrafast energy flow in light-harvesting complex ii

    Eric A Arsenault, Yusuke Yoneda, Masakazu Iwai, Krishna K Niyogi, and Graham R Fleming. Vibronic mixing enables ultrafast energy flow in light-harvesting complex ii. Nature communications, 11(1):1460, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Quantum coherences reveal excited-state dynamics in biophysical systems

    Lili Wang, Marco A Allodi, and Gregory S Engel. Quantum coherences reveal excited-state dynamics in biophysical systems. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 3(8):477–490, 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    From fundamental theories to quantum coherences in electron transfer

    Shahnawaz Rafiq and Gregory D Scholes. From fundamental theories to quantum coherences in electron transfer. Journal of the American Chemical Society , 141(2):708–722, 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Ultrafast charge transfer coupled with lattice phonons in two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks

    Tae Wu Kim, Sunhong Jun, Yoonhoo Ha, Rajesh K Yadav, Abhishek Kumar, Chung-Yul Yoo, Inhwan Oh, Hyung-Kyu Lim, Jae Won Shin, Ryong Ryoo, et al. Ultrafast charge transfer coupled with lattice phonons in two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks. Nature Communications, 10(1):1873, 2019

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical

    Wojciech Hubert Zurek. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of modern physics, 75(3):715, 2003

    work page 2003

  24. [24]

    Time evolution of a quantum system in contact with a nearly gaussian-markoffian noise bath

    Yoshitaka Tanimura and Ryogo Kubo. Time evolution of a quantum system in contact with a nearly gaussian-markoffian noise bath. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 58(1):101–114, 1989

    work page 1989

  25. [25]

    Stochastic liouville, langevin, fokker–planck, and master equation approaches to quantum dissipative systems

    Yoshitaka Tanimura. Stochastic liouville, langevin, fokker–planck, and master equation approaches to quantum dissipative systems. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 75(8):082001, 2006

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Unified treatment of quantum coherent and incoherent hopping dynamics in electronic energy transfer: Reduced hierarchy equation approach

    Akihito Ishizaki and Graham R Fleming. Unified treatment of quantum coherent and incoherent hopping dynamics in electronic energy transfer: Reduced hierarchy equation approach. The Journal of chemical physics , 130(23), 2009

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Exact dynamics of dissipative electronic systems and quantum transport: Hierarchical equations of motion approach

    Jinshuang Jin, Xiao Zheng, and YiJing Yan. Exact dynamics of dissipative electronic systems and quantum transport: Hierarchical equations of motion approach. The Journal of chemical physics , 128(23), 2008

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Simulating quantum brownian motion with single trapped ions

    Sabrina Maniscalco, Jyrki Piilo, F Intravaia, F Petruccione, and A Messina. Simulating quantum brownian motion with single trapped ions. Physical Review A, 69(5):052101, 2004

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    Linear optics simulation of quantum non-markovian dynamics

    Andrea Chiuri, Chiara Greganti, Laura Mazzola, Mauro Paternostro, and Paolo Mataloni. Linear optics simulation of quantum non-markovian dynamics. Scientific reports, 2(1):968, 2012

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Quantum simulator of an open quantum system using superconducting qubits: exciton transport in photosynthetic complexes

    Sarah Mostame, Patrick Rebentrost, Alexander Eisfeld, Andrew J Kerman, Dimitris I Tsomokos, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik. Quantum simulator of an open quantum system using superconducting qubits: exciton transport in photosynthetic complexes. New Journal of Physics , 14(10):105013, 2012

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    Studying light-harvesting models with superconducting circuits nat, 2018

    P Anton et al. Studying light-harvesting models with superconducting circuits nat, 2018. 16 Chin-Yi Lin, Shin Sun, Li-Chai Shih, and Yuan-Chung Cheng

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Efficient quantum simulation of photosynthetic light harvesting

    Bi-Xue Wang, Ming-Jie Tao, Qing Ai, Tao Xin, Neill Lambert, Dong Ruan, Yuan-Chung Cheng, Franco Nori, Fu-Guo Deng, and Gui-Lu Long. Efficient quantum simulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. NPJ Quantum Information, 4(1):52, 2018

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Trapped-ion quantum simulation of excitation transport: Disordered, noisy, and long-range connected quantum networks

    Nils Trautmann and Philipp Hauke. Trapped-ion quantum simulation of excitation transport: Disordered, noisy, and long-range connected quantum networks. Physical Review A, 97(2):023606, 2018

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Simulating physics with computers

    Richard P Feynman et al. Simulating physics with computers. Int. j. Theor. phys, 21(6/7), 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Universal quantum simulators

    Seth Lloyd. Universal quantum simulators. Science, 273(5278):1073–1078, 1996

    work page 1996

  36. [36]

    Environment-assisted quantum transport in a 10-qubit network

    Christine Maier, Tiff Brydges, Petar Jurcevic, Nils Trautmann, Cornelius Hempel, Ben P Lanyon, Philipp Hauke, Rainer Blatt, and Christian F Roos. Environment-assisted quantum transport in a 10-qubit network. Physical review letters, 122(5):050501, 2019

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Quantum algorithm for the simulation of open-system dynamics and thermalization

    Hong-Yi Su and Ying Li. Quantum algorithm for the simulation of open-system dynamics and thermalization. Physical Review A, 101(1):012328, 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Ibm q experience as a versatile experimental testbed for simulating open quantum systems

    Guillermo García-Pérez, Matteo AC Rossi, and Sabrina Maniscalco. Ibm q experience as a versatile experimental testbed for simulating open quantum systems. npj Quantum Information, 6(1):1, 2020

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Simulation of thermal relaxation in spin chemistry systems on a quantum computer using inherent qubit decoherence

    Brian Rost, Barbara Jones, Mariya Vyushkova, Aaila Ali, Charlotte Cullip, Alexander Vyushkov, and Jarek Nabrzyski. Simulation of thermal relaxation in spin chemistry systems on a quantum computer using inherent qubit decoherence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.00794, 2020. 8 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 8.1 Identity Gate Error To incorporate IBM-Q computer errors...

    work page arXiv 2001