Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

(Debiased) Contrastive Learning Loss for Recommendation (Technical Report)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.08517 v2 pith:IAIV6O5K submitted 2023-12-13 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords debiasedlosseslosscontrastiverecommendationlearningpointwiseanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we perform a systemic examination of the recommendation losses, including listwise (softmax), pairwise(BPR), and pointwise (mean-squared error, MSE, and Cosine Contrastive Loss, CCL) losses through the lens of contrastive learning. We introduce and study both debiased InfoNCE and mutual information neural estimator (MINE), for the first time, under the recommendation setting. We also relate and differentiate these two losses with the BPR loss through the lower bound analysis. Furthermore, we present the debiased pointwise loss (for both MSE and CCL) and theoretically certify both iALS and EASE, two of the most popular linear models, are inherently debiased. The empirical experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the debiased losses and newly introduced mutual-information losses outperform the existing (biased) ones.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PatchSeeker: Mapping NVD Records to their Vulnerability-fixing Commits with LLM Generated Commits and Embeddings

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PatchSeeker maps NVD vulnerability records to their fixing commits by embedding CVE descriptions and LLM-generated commit summaries, outperforming prior tools by up to 59.3% in MRR and 27.9% in Recall@10.

Pith tools