Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Simulated Reconstruction and Reidentification Attack on the 2010 U.S. Census

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.11283 v3 pith:QQFMMCSQ submitted 2023-12-18 stat.AP cs.CRecon.EM

classification stat.APcs.CRecon.EM
keywords censuspublishedreconstructedrecordsaccuracyattackbetterconfidential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that individual, confidential microdata records from the 2010 U.S. Census of Population and Housing can be accurately reconstructed from the published tabular summaries. Ninety-seven million person records (every resident in 70% of all census blocks) are exactly reconstructed with provable certainty using only public information. We further show that a hypothetical attacker using our methods can reidentify with 95% accuracy population unique individuals who are perfectly reconstructed and not in the modal race and ethnicity category in their census block (3.4 million persons)--a result that is only possible because their confidential records were used in the published tabulations. Finally, we show that the methods used for the 2020 Census, based on a differential privacy framework, provide better protection against this type of attack, with better published data accuracy, than feasible alternatives.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Better Attribute Inference Vulnerability Measures

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A precision-recall composite measure with an original-data baseline labels over 25% of attacks on weakly anonymized microdata as at risk that the prior accuracy-only approach called safe.

Pith tools