Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Extracting Interpretable Local and Global Representations from Attention on Time Series

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.11466 v1 pith:MFLN7QQT submitted 2023-09-16 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords approachesglobalinterpretabilitylocalmethodspresentedseriestime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper targets two transformer attention based interpretability methods working with local abstraction and global representation, in the context of time series data. We distinguish local and global contexts, and provide a comprehensive framework for both general interpretation options. We discuss their specific instantiation via different methods in detail, also outlining their respective computational implementation and abstraction variants. Furthermore, we provide extensive experimentation demonstrating the efficacy of the presented approaches. In particular, we perform our experiments using a selection of univariate datasets from the UCR UEA time series repository where we both assess the performance of the proposed approaches, as well as their impact on explainability and interpretability/complexity. Here, with an extensive analysis of hyperparameters, the presented approaches demonstrate an significant improvement in interpretability/complexity, while capturing many core decisions of and maintaining a similar performance to the baseline model. Finally, we draw general conclusions outlining and guiding the application of the presented methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Saliency Maps are Ambiguous: Analysis of Logical Relations on First and Second Order Attributions

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On synthetic AND/OR/XOR datasets with perfectly accurate models, every tested saliency method sometimes ranks a truly irrelevant input above a necessary one, so the scores cannot be trusted as relevance rankings.

Pith tools