Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explain To Decide: A Human-Centric Review on the Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in AI-assisted Decision Making

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.11507 v1 pith:ATG4QPI7 submitted 2023-12-11 cs.HC cs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.LG
keywords modelsmodelperformanceapproachesartificialbeendecisiondecision-making
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The unprecedented performance of machine learning models in recent years, particularly Deep Learning and transformer models, has resulted in their application in various domains such as finance, healthcare, and education. However, the models are error-prone and cannot be used autonomously, especially in decision-making scenarios where, technically or ethically, the cost of error is high. Moreover, because of the black-box nature of these models, it is frequently difficult for the end user to comprehend the models' outcomes and underlying processes to trust and use the model outcome to make a decision. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aids end-user understanding of the model by utilizing approaches, including visualization techniques, to explain and interpret the inner workings of the model and how it arrives at a result. Although numerous research studies have been conducted recently focusing on the performance of models and the XAI approaches, less work has been done on the impact of explanations on human-AI team performance. This paper surveyed the recent empirical studies on XAI's impact on human-AI decision-making, identified the challenges, and proposed future research directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Empirical Examination of the Evaluative AI Framework

    cs.HC 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A pre-registered experiment found that an AI providing only pro and con evidence, without recommendations, did not improve decision performance and was used shallowly by participants.

Pith tools