REVIEW 2 cited by
Rule-Extraction Methods From Feedforward Neural Networks: A Systematic Literature Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Motivated by the interpretability question in ML models as a crucial element for the successful deployment of AI systems, this paper focuses on rule extraction as a means for neural networks interpretability. Through a systematic literature review, different approaches for extracting rules from feedforward neural networks, an important block in deep learning models, are identified and explored. The findings reveal a range of methods developed for over two decades, mostly suitable for shallow neural networks, with recent developments to meet deep learning models' challenges. Rules offer a transparent and intuitive means of explaining neural networks, making this study a comprehensive introduction for researchers interested in the field. While the study specifically addresses feedforward networks with supervised learning and crisp rules, future work can extend to other network types, machine learning methods, and fuzzy rule extraction.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Neuron-Anchored Rule Extraction for Large Language Models via Contrastive Hierarchical Ablation
MechaRule localizes agonist neurons in LLMs via contrastive hierarchical ablation to ground rule extraction in circuitry, recalling 96.8% of high-effect neurons and reducing task performance when suppressed.
-
Neuron-Anchored Rule Extraction for Large Language Models via Contrastive Hierarchical Ablation
MechaRule localizes sparse agonist neurons via contrastive hierarchical ablation and adaptive group testing to ground rule extraction, recalling 97% of high-effect activations at 2.14% cost while enabling near-total e...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.