REVIEW 2 cited by
Automated DevOps Pipeline Generation for Code Repositories using Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Automating software development processes through the orchestration of GitHub Action workflows has revolutionized the efficiency and agility of software delivery pipelines. This paper presents a detailed investigation into the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) specifically, GPT 3.5 and GPT 4 to generate and evaluate GitHub Action workflows for DevOps tasks. Our methodology involves data collection from public GitHub repositories, prompt engineering for LLM utilization, and evaluation metrics encompassing exact match scores, BLEU scores, and a novel DevOps Aware score. The research scrutinizes the proficiency of GPT 3.5 and GPT 4 in generating GitHub workflows, while assessing the influence of various prompt elements in constructing the most efficient pipeline. Results indicate substantial advancements in GPT 4, particularly in DevOps awareness and syntax correctness. The research introduces a GitHub App built on Probot, empowering users to automate workflow generation within GitHub ecosystem. This study contributes insights into the evolving landscape of AI-driven automation in DevOps practices.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Doc2CI: A Multi-Service Study of CI Configuration Generation Using Large Language Models
Across four CI services and 16 LLMs, exact reproduction of reference configs stays below 3.2%, while schema validity (about 71%) trails parse rate (97%), showing similarity and usability are different objectives.
-
Can LLMs Write CI? A Study on Automatic Generation of GitHub Actions Configurations
Across six LLMs, zero-shot generation of GitHub Actions YAML configurations reaches 69% similarity to ground truth but only 3% exact matches, with code-pretrained models performing no better than general-purpose ones.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.