REVIEW 1 cited by
Position Paper: Bridging the Gap Between Machine Learning and Sensitivity Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We argue that interpretations of machine learning (ML) models or the model-building process can be seen as a form of sensitivity analysis (SA), a general methodology used to explain complex systems in many fields such as environmental modeling, engineering, or economics. We address both researchers and practitioners, calling attention to the benefits of a unified SA-based view of explanations in ML and the necessity to fully credit related work. We bridge the gap between both fields by formally describing how (a) the ML process is a system suitable for SA, (b) how existing ML interpretation methods relate to this perspective, and (c) how other SA techniques could be applied to ML.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On Measuring Intrinsic Causal Attributions in Deep Neural Networks
Intrinsic causal contributions of input features to a neural network's output can be estimated from observational data via causal normalizing flows, and reduce to Sobol indices when inputs are independent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.