Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Position Paper: Bridging the Gap Between Machine Learning and Sensitivity Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.13234 v2 pith:M6CTVICE submitted 2023-12-20 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords analysisfieldslearningmachineprocesssensitivityaddressapplied
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We argue that interpretations of machine learning (ML) models or the model-building process can be seen as a form of sensitivity analysis (SA), a general methodology used to explain complex systems in many fields such as environmental modeling, engineering, or economics. We address both researchers and practitioners, calling attention to the benefits of a unified SA-based view of explanations in ML and the necessity to fully credit related work. We bridge the gap between both fields by formally describing how (a) the ML process is a system suitable for SA, (b) how existing ML interpretation methods relate to this perspective, and (c) how other SA techniques could be applied to ML.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Measuring Intrinsic Causal Attributions in Deep Neural Networks

    stat.ML 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Intrinsic causal contributions of input features to a neural network's output can be estimated from observational data via causal normalizing flows, and reduce to Sobol indices when inputs are independent.

Pith tools