REVIEW 2 cited by
Conformal Perturbation Theory for $n$-Point Functions: Structure Constant Deformation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider conformal perturbation theory for $n$-point functions on the sphere in general 2D CFTs to first order in coupling constant. We regulate perturbation integrals using canonical hard disk excisions of size $\epsilon$ around the fixed operator insertions, and identify the full set of counter terms which are sufficient to regulate all such integrated $n$-point functions. We further explore the integrated 4-point function which computes changes to the structure constants of the theory. Using an $sl(2)$ map, the three fixed locations of operators are mapped to $0$, $1$, and $\infty$. We show that approximating the mapped excised regions to leading order in $\epsilon$ does not lead to the same perturbative shift to the structure constant as the exact in $\epsilon$ region. We explicitly compute the correction back to the exact in $\epsilon$ region of integration in terms of the CFT data. We consider the compact boson, and show that one must use the exact in $\epsilon$ region to obtain agreement with the exact results for structure constants in this theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Covering space maps for $n$-point functions with three long twists
Explicit covering-space maps for three long twists plus any number of twist-2 operators are constructed, yielding closed-form four- and five-point bare twist correlators in the ΔN=1,2 cases.
-
Quantum chaos and pole skipping in two-dimensional conformal perturbation theory
A deformed 2D CFT's stress-tensor pole-skipping point shifts at O(lambda^2); at h=1/2 the shift matches the holographic butterfly velocity.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.