RECORD
The invariant of $PGU(3,q)$ in the Hermitian function field
Number Theory · Submitted 21 Dec 2023
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We determine the invariant of $Aut(\mathbb{K}(\mathcal{H}_q))\cong PGU(3,q)$, and discuss some related questions on Galois subcovers of maximal curves over finite fields.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Let $F=F|\mathbb{K}$ a be function field over an algebraically closed constant field $\mathbb{K}$ of positive characteristic $p$. For a $\mathbb{K}$-automorphism group $G$ of $F$, the invariant of $G$ is the fixed field $F^G$ of $G$. If $F$ has transendency degree $1$ (i.e. $F$ is the function field of an irreducible curve) and $F^G$ is rational, then each generator of $F^G$ uniquely determines $F^G$ and it makes sense to call each of them the invariant of $G$. In this paper, $F$ is the Hermitian function field $\mathbb{K}(\mathcal{H}_q)=\mathbb{K}(x,y)$ with $y^q+y-x^{q+1}=0$ and $q=p^r$. We determine the invariant of $Aut(\mathbb{K}(\mathcal{H}_q))\cong PGU(3,q)$, and discuss some related questions on Galois subcovers of maximal curves over finite fields.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Let $F=F|\mathbb{K}$ a be function field over an algebraically closed constant field $\mathbb{K}$ of positive characteristic $p$. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.01 | asserted 0.80 |
| s1 | For a $\mathbb{K}$-automorphism group $G$ of $F$, the invariant of $G$ is the fixed field $F^G$ of $G$. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | If $F$ has transendency degree $1$ (i.e. $F$ is the function field of an irreducible curve) and $F^G$ is rational, then each generator of $F^G$ uniquely determines $F^G$ and it makes sense to call each of them the invariant of $G$. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.03 | asserted 0.98 |
| s3 | In this paper, $F$ is the Hermitian function field $\mathbb{K}(\mathcal{H}_q)=\mathbb{K}(x,y)$ with $y^q+y-x^{q+1}=0$ and $q=p^r$. | background 0.67 | 0.22 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | We determine the invariant of $Aut(\mathbb{K}(\mathcal{H}_q))\cong PGU(3,q)$, and discuss some related questions on Galois subcovers of maximal curves over finite fields. | contribution 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.86 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Let $F=F|\mathbb{K}$ a be function field over an algebraically closed constant field $\mathbb{K}$ of positive characteristic $p$. For a $\mathbb{K}$-automorphism group $G$ of $F$, the invariant of $G$ is the fixed field $F^G$ of $G$. If $F$ has transendency degree $1$ (i.e. $F$ is the function field of an irreducible curve) and $F^G$ is rational, then each generator of $F^G$ uniquely determines $F^G$ and it makes sense to call each of them the invariant of $G$. In this paper, $F$ is the Hermitian function field $\mathbb{K}(\mathcal{H}_q)=\mathbb{K}(x,y)$ with $y^q+y-x^{q+1}=0$ and $q=p^r$. We determine the invariant of $Aut(\mathbb{K}(\mathcal{H}_q))\cong PGU(3,q)$, and discuss some related questions on Galois subcovers of maximal curves over finite fields.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites
Cites as background 1 paper
-
The study of modular invariants was initiated in the 1910s by the pioneering work of Dickson and it is still an active research area also in connection with the study of Chern classes; see for instance [ref] .
2306.17599 · Introduction · 0.98
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.