Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Generative AI and the History of Architecture

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.15106 v1 pith:3MAHZYU7 submitted 2023-12-22 cs.AI cs.IR

classification cs.AIcs.IR
keywords generativearchitecturalhistoryalreadyarchitectureknowledgeplatformsstyles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent generative AI platforms are able to create texts or impressive images from simple text prompts. This makes them powerful tools for summarizing knowledge about architectural history or deriving new creative work in early design tasks like ideation, sketching and modelling. But, how good is the understanding of the generative AI models of the history of architecture? Has it learned to properly distinguish styles, or is it hallucinating information? In this chapter, we investigate this question for generative AI platforms for text and image generation for different architectural styles, to understand the capabilities and boundaries of knowledge of those tools. We also analyze how they are already being used by analyzing a data set of 101 million Midjourney queries to see if and how practitioners are already querying for specific architectural concepts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools