Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Controllability for forward stochastic parabolic equations with dynamic boundary conditions without extra forces

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.15537 v2 pith:GYBDHEEF submitted 2023-12-24 math.AP math.OC

Said Boulite , Abdellatif Elgrou , Lahcen Maniar , Omar Oukdach This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.OC
keywords controllabilitystochasticboundaryconditionsdynamicextraforcesforward
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we continue the study of some controllability issues for the forward stochastic parabolic equation with dynamic boundary conditions. The main novelty in the present paper consists of considering only one control without extra forces in the noise parts. Utilizing an adequate spectral inequality and the iterative Lebeau-Robiano strategy, we first establish an observability inequality for the corresponding adjoint backward stochastic system. The null controllability result is then established by the classical duality approach. As a consequence of the null controllability property, an approximate controllability result is proved.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Insensitizing controls for stochastic parabolic equations with dynamic boundary conditions

    math.OC 2024-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors attempt to prove existence of insensitizing controls for a stochastic heat equation with dynamic boundary conditions, but a key Carleman-to-observability step in the proof is invalid.

Pith tools