Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Align on the Fly: Adapting Chatbot Behavior to Established Norms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.15907 v1 pith:A2TIPJNK submitted 2023-12-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords alignmentmethodvaluesalignestablishedhumannormsproposed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we aim to align large language models with the ever-changing, complex, and diverse human values (e.g., social norms) across time and locations. This presents a challenge to existing alignment techniques, such as supervised fine-tuning, which internalize values within model parameters. To overcome this, we propose an On-the-fly Preference Optimization (OPO) method, which is a real-time alignment that works in a streaming way. It employs an external memory to store established rules for alignment, which can constrain LLMs' behaviors without further training, allowing for convenient updates and customization of human values. We also introduce a scalable evaluation to assess the proposed method more effectively. Experimental results on both human-annotated and auto-generated questions from legal and moral domains indicate the effectiveness of the proposed OPO method. Our code and data are released at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/OPO.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that catalogs and categorizes training-free LLM alignment methods into pre-decoding, in-decoding, and post-decoding, with a limited experimental comparison on one model.

  2. Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Machine unlearning is not a comprehensive solution for AI safety; it is best suited to data removal, while capability control faces fundamental and unresolved challenges.

  3. The Road to Artificial SuperIntelligence: A Comprehensive Survey of Superalignment

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of scalable oversight for superalignment, reviewing weak-to-strong generalization, debate, RLAIF, and sandwiching, and concluding that current methods are not yet sufficient for superintelligent AI.

Pith tools