REVIEW 3 cited by
Align on the Fly: Adapting Chatbot Behavior to Established Norms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we aim to align large language models with the ever-changing, complex, and diverse human values (e.g., social norms) across time and locations. This presents a challenge to existing alignment techniques, such as supervised fine-tuning, which internalize values within model parameters. To overcome this, we propose an On-the-fly Preference Optimization (OPO) method, which is a real-time alignment that works in a streaming way. It employs an external memory to store established rules for alignment, which can constrain LLMs' behaviors without further training, allowing for convenient updates and customization of human values. We also introduce a scalable evaluation to assess the proposed method more effectively. Experimental results on both human-annotated and auto-generated questions from legal and moral domains indicate the effectiveness of the proposed OPO method. Our code and data are released at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/OPO.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models
A survey that catalogs and categorizes training-free LLM alignment methods into pre-decoding, in-decoding, and post-decoding, with a limited experimental comparison on one model.
-
Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety
Machine unlearning is not a comprehensive solution for AI safety; it is best suited to data removal, while capability control faces fundamental and unresolved challenges.
-
The Road to Artificial SuperIntelligence: A Comprehensive Survey of Superalignment
A survey of scalable oversight for superalignment, reviewing weak-to-strong generalization, debate, RLAIF, and sandwiching, and concluding that current methods are not yet sufficient for superintelligent AI.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.