Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Tracking with Human-Intent Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.17448 v1 pith:4POUT6BD submitted 2023-12-29 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords trackingtrackgptperformanceinstructionobjectcalledembeddingsevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Advances in perception modeling have significantly improved the performance of object tracking. However, the current methods for specifying the target object in the initial frame are either by 1) using a box or mask template, or by 2) providing an explicit language description. These manners are cumbersome and do not allow the tracker to have self-reasoning ability. Therefore, this work proposes a new tracking task -- Instruction Tracking, which involves providing implicit tracking instructions that require the trackers to perform tracking automatically in video frames. To achieve this, we investigate the integration of knowledge and reasoning capabilities from a Large Vision-Language Model (LVLM) for object tracking. Specifically, we propose a tracker called TrackGPT, which is capable of performing complex reasoning-based tracking. TrackGPT first uses LVLM to understand tracking instructions and condense the cues of what target to track into referring embeddings. The perception component then generates the tracking results based on the embeddings. To evaluate the performance of TrackGPT, we construct an instruction tracking benchmark called InsTrack, which contains over one thousand instruction-video pairs for instruction tuning and evaluation. Experiments show that TrackGPT achieves competitive performance on referring video object segmentation benchmarks, such as getting a new state-of the-art performance of 66.5 $\mathcal{J}\&\mathcal{F}$ on Refer-DAVIS. It also demonstrates a superior performance of instruction tracking under new evaluation protocols. The code and models are available at \href{https://github.com/jiawen-zhu/TrackGPT}{https://github.com/jiawen-zhu/TrackGPT}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. STAC: Selective Spatiotemporal Aggregation and Compression for Video Reasoning Segmentation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SSM enrichment before hierarchical adaptive compression cuts video tokens 85% and yields 1.8× speedup while matching or exceeding uncompressed baselines on zero-shot reasoning segmentation.

  2. Unleashing Hierarchical Reasoning: An LLM-Driven Framework for Training-Free Referring Video Object Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free pipeline parses a video query with an LLM, tracks candidates with SAM2, then uses coarse motion plus conditional pose reasoning to segment the referred object.

  3. VideoMolmo: Spatio-Temporal Grounding Meets Pointing

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A video language model that conditions each frame on earlier frames via a temporal attention module, predicts text-requested object points, and uses SAM2-based bidirectional mask fusion to outperform prior models on v...

  4. Reasoning Segmentation for Images and Videos: A Survey

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper organizes the field of reasoning segmentation into image and video tracks, cataloging 26 methods, 12 metrics, and 29 datasets.

Pith tools