pith. machine review for the scientific record.
sign in

arxiv: 1607.01648 · v1 · pith:23T44I64new · submitted 2016-07-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

Comment on Adler's "Does the Peres experiment using photons test for hyper-complex (quaternionic) quantum theories?"

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantumquaternionicmechanicsadlereffectsassumptionsexampleexperiment
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In his recent article [arXiv:1604.04950], Adler questions the usefulness of the bound found in our experimental search for genuine effects of hyper-complex quantum mechanics [arXiv:1602.01624]. Our experiment was performed using a black-box (instrumentalist) approach to generalized probabilistic theories; therefore, it does not assume a priori any particular underlying mechanism. From that point of view our experimental results do indeed place meaningful bounds on possible effects of "post-quantum theories", including quaternionic quantum mechanics. In his article, Adler compares our experiment to non-relativistic and M\"oller formal scattering theory within quaternionic quantum mechanics. With a particular set of assumptions, he finds that quaternionic effects would likely not manifest themselves in general. Although these assumptions are justified in the non-relativistic case, a proper calculation for relativistic particles is still missing. Here, we provide a concrete relativistic example of Klein-Gordon scattering wherein the quaternionic effects persist. We note that when the Klein-Gordon equation is formulated using a Hamiltonian formalism it displays a so-called "indefinite metric", a characteristic feature of relativistic quantum wave equations. In Adler's example this is directly forbidden by his assumptions, and therefore our present example is not in contradiction to his work. In complex quantum mechanics this problem of an indefinite metric is solved in second quantization. Unfortunately, there is no known algorithm for canonical field quantization in quaternionic quantum mechanics.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.