REVIEW 4 cited by
Interpretable to Whom? A Role-based Model for Analyzing Interpretable Machine Learning Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Several researchers have argued that a machine learning system's interpretability should be defined in relation to a specific agent or task: we should not ask if the system is interpretable, but to whom is it interpretable. We describe a model intended to help answer this question, by identifying different roles that agents can fulfill in relation to the machine learning system. We illustrate the use of our model in a variety of scenarios, exploring how an agent's role influences its goals, and the implications for defining interpretability. Finally, we make suggestions for how our model could be useful to interpretability researchers, system developers, and regulatory bodies auditing machine learning systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The 2025 AI Agent Index: Documenting Technical and Safety Features of Deployed Agentic AI Systems
The 2025 AI Agent Index catalogs technical and safety details for 30 deployed AI agents and finds low developer transparency on safety, evaluations, and societal impacts.
-
Are machine learning interpretations reliable? A stability study on global interpretations
Popular machine learning interpretation methods are frequently unstable under small data perturbations, and interpretation stability does not track prediction accuracy.
-
A Taxonomy for Design and Evaluation of Prompt-Based Natural Language Explanations
A three-part taxonomy for prompt-based natural language explanations, covering context, generation and presentation, and evaluation with 15 desirable properties.
-
Explainable AI Systems Must Be Contestable: Here's How to Make It Happen
The paper proposes a definition of contestability for AI, a four-dimension taxonomy, and a weighted Contestability Assessment Score, applied to three illustrative case studies.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.