Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Similar Cases Recommendation using Legal Knowledge Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.04771 v2 pith:23XOLHZM submitted 2021-07-10 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords knowledgecasesgraphslegalapplicationscourtlikesimilar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A legal knowledge graph constructed from court cases, judgments, laws and other legal documents can enable a number of applications like question answering, document similarity, and search. While the use of knowledge graphs for distant supervision in NLP tasks is well researched, using knowledge graphs for applications like case similarity presents challenges. In this work, we describe our solution for predicting similar cases in Indian court judgements. We present our results and also discuss the impact of large language models on this task.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Missing Link: Joint Legal Citation Prediction using Heterogeneous Graph Enrichment

    cs.SI 2025-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A graph neural network that enriches legal citation graphs with categorical metadata nodes predicts case and law citations more accurately than prior GNN baselines, and joint training boosts case citation prediction.

  2. An Integrated Framework of Prompt Engineering and Multidimensional Knowledge Graphs for Legal Dispute Analysis

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A prompt-plus-knowledge-graph framework for legal dispute analysis reports improved LLM sensitivity and citation accuracy on a 100-pair test set, but with limited statistical support.

Pith tools