REVIEW 2 cited by
Robust Quantum Control in Closed and Open Systems: Theory and Practice
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Robust control of quantum systems is an increasingly relevant field of study amidst the second quantum revolution, but there remains a gap between taming quantum physics and robust control in its modern analytical form that culminated in fundamental performance bounds. With certain exceptions such as quantum optical systems that can be modeled as linear stochastic differential equations, quantum systems are not amenable to linear, time-invariant, measurement-based robust control techniques, and thus novel gap-bridging techniques must be developed. This survey is written for control theorists to provide a review of the current state of quantum control and outline the challenges faced in trying to apply modern robust control to quantum systems. We present issues that arise when applying classical robust control theory to quantum systems, typical methods used by quantum physicists to explore such systems and their robustness, as well as a discussion of open problems to be addressed in the field. We focus on general, practical applications and recent work to enable control researchers to contribute to advancing this burgeoning field.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Robust Control of High-dimensional Quantum Systems against Coherent and Incoherent Errors
ST-GRAPE uses Suzuki-Trotter splitting of the augmented Lindblad propagator to design robust quantum controls at O(Nd^3) per-step cost instead of O(N^2d^4).
-
Robust implicit quantum control of interacting spin chains
Robust control pulses for interacting spin chains are computed in a polynomial-sized operator space, maintaining about 99.9 percent fidelity under up to 5 percent static coupling errors.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.