Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Empirical Study of Large Language Models as Automated Essay Scoring Tools in English Composition__Taking TOEFL Independent Writing Task for Example

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.03401 v1 pith:UOAFAR6I submitted 2024-01-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords automatedscoringchatgptessaylanguagemodelslargeprompts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in tasks involving natural language generation, reasoning, and comprehension. This study aims to construct prompts and comments grounded in the diverse scoring criteria delineated within the official TOEFL guide. The primary objective is to assess the capabilities and constraints of ChatGPT, a prominent representative of large language models, within the context of automated essay scoring. The prevailing methodologies for automated essay scoring involve the utilization of deep neural networks, statistical machine learning techniques, and fine-tuning pre-trained models. However, these techniques face challenges when applied to different contexts or subjects, primarily due to their substantial data requirements and limited adaptability to small sample sizes. In contrast, this study employs ChatGPT to conduct an automated evaluation of English essays, even with a small sample size, employing an experimental approach. The empirical findings indicate that ChatGPT can provide operational functionality for automated essay scoring, although the results exhibit a regression effect. It is imperative to underscore that the effective design and implementation of ChatGPT prompts necessitate a profound domain expertise and technical proficiency, as these prompts are subject to specific threshold criteria. Keywords: ChatGPT, Automated Essay Scoring, Prompt Learning, TOEFL Independent Writing Task

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CAFES: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Multi-Granular Multimodal Essay Scoring

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A student-teacher multi-agent pipeline with positive-only feedback improves QWK agreement with human essay scores by 21% on a multimodal benchmark, with gains concentrated in traits where baselines were weakest.

Pith tools