pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.04927 · v1 · submitted 2024-01-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Crystallographic defects in Weyl semimetal LaAlGe

Inseo Kim , Byungkyun Kang , Hyunsoo Kim , Minseok Choi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 04:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Weyl semimetalcrystallographic defectsantisite defectsLaAlGedensity functional theoryelectron dopingchemical potential
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ge_Al antisites in LaAlGe donate electrons and shift the chemical potential, masking Weyl features.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates formation enthalpies of vacancies and antisites in LaAlGe using hybrid density functional theory. It finds that Ge replacing Al is the dominant defect because of its low formation energy, and this defect donates electrons. The resulting n-type doping moves the chemical potential vertically while the defects also scatter carriers. Consequently both spectroscopic and transport signatures expected from Weyl nodes become harder to observe in real crystals. The same defect behavior is expected across the RAlGe series.

Core claim

Hybrid-density-functional theory calculations show that Al- and Ge-related defects form readily in the I4_1md phase of LaAlGe, with the Ge-on-Al antisite (Ge_Al) having the lowest formation enthalpy. This defect is donor-like, producing effective electron doping that shifts the chemical potential and adds scattering centers, thereby hindering both spectroscopic and transport features that arise from Weyl physics.

What carries the argument

Hybrid-density-functional theory calculations of defect formation enthalpies for vacancies and antisites.

If this is right

  • The most abundant defect Ge_Al acts as an electron donor in addition to a scattering center.
  • A substantial vertical shift of the chemical potential occurs because of the donated electrons.
  • Naturally occurring defects hinder spectroscopic and transport signatures of Weyl physics.
  • The same defect formation pattern applies to the broader RAlGe family of magnetic Weyl semimetals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Reducing Ge_Al concentration through modified growth conditions could restore clearer access to intrinsic Weyl-node properties.
  • Intentional compensation doping might be used to counteract the electron donation and retune the chemical potential to the Weyl nodes.
  • The calculated donor character predicts a measurable n-type carrier density that can be checked against transport data on high-quality crystals.

Load-bearing premise

Low formation enthalpy at zero temperature and fixed chemical potentials directly implies high equilibrium concentration of Ge_Al during actual crystal growth.

What would settle it

Direct counting of Ge_Al antisite densities in as-grown LaAlGe crystals by atomically resolved microscopy, or comparison of measured versus predicted Fermi-level position from Hall or ARPES data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2401.04927 by Byungkyun Kang, Hyunsoo Kim, Inseo Kim, Minseok Choi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Allowed values of the atomic chemical potentials defining the stability of LaAlGe. The chemical potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Crystal structure, (b) density of states, and (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Local atomic structures of the lattice vacancies ((a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Calculated relative position of the Fermi level as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Crystallographic defects in a topological semimetal can result in charge doping, and the scattering due to the defects may mask its exotic transport properties. Here, we investigate the possible crystallographic defects including vacancy and antisite in Weyl semimetal LaAlGe using hybrid-density-functional theory calculations. We show that a considerable concentration of Al- and Ge-related defects naturally form during growth due to their low formation enthalpy. Specifically, Al can be easily replaced by Ge in the $I4_1md$ phase of LaAlGe, forming the Ge-on-Al antisite, Ge$_{\rm Al}$. The counterpart, Al-on-Ge (Al$_{\rm Ge}$), is also probable. The most abundant defect Ge$_{\rm Al}$ is donor-like, effectively electron-doping, and these defects are therefore not only scattering centers in the electronic transport process but may also induce the substantial vertical shift of the chemical potential. The results imply that the naturally occurring defects hinder both spectroscopic and transport features arising from the Weyl physics in LaAlGe. Our work can be applied to the $R$AlGe family ($R$=rare earth) and help improve the quality of single-crystal magnetic Weyl semimetal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates vacancies and antisite defects in the Weyl semimetal LaAlGe via hybrid DFT. It reports that Ge_Al and Al_Ge antisites possess low formation enthalpies and therefore occur in considerable concentrations during growth; Ge_Al is donor-like, producing electron doping that shifts the chemical potential and masks Weyl signatures in transport and spectroscopy. The work extends to the broader RAlGe family.

Significance. If the formation-enthalpy to concentration mapping is placed on a firmer footing, the results would establish native antisite defects as a dominant source of unintentional doping in LaAlGe, explaining deviations from ideal Weyl transport and guiding synthesis improvements across the RAlGe series.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'considerable concentration of Al- and Ge-related defects naturally form during growth due to their low formation enthalpy' rests on zero-temperature formation enthalpies evaluated at unspecified or fixed chemical potentials; equilibrium concentrations require chemical potentials fixed by the La-Al-Ge phase diagram at growth temperature, vibrational free-energy corrections, and verification that E_f remains below ~0.5-1 eV under those conditions, none of which are shown.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that Ge_Al 'is donor-like, effectively electron-doping' and induces a 'substantial vertical shift of the chemical potential' is presented without reported defect concentrations, Fermi-level positions relative to the Weyl nodes, or comparison to measured carrier densities, leaving the quantitative impact on Weyl physics unsupported.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'hybrid-density-functional theory calculations' without naming the functional, exact-exchange fraction, or k-point/supercell convergence tests.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address the two major points on the abstract below and have revised the manuscript (abstract and discussion) to clarify the scope and limitations of our zero-temperature calculations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'considerable concentration of Al- and Ge-related defects naturally form during growth due to their low formation enthalpy' rests on zero-temperature formation enthalpies evaluated at unspecified or fixed chemical potentials; equilibrium concentrations require chemical potentials fixed by the La-Al-Ge phase diagram at growth temperature, vibrational free-energy corrections, and verification that E_f remains below ~0.5-1 eV under those conditions, none of which are shown.

    Authors: We agree that equilibrium concentrations at growth temperature would ideally incorporate the full La-Al-Ge phase diagram, vibrational corrections, and explicit verification of E_f. Our formation enthalpies are computed at 0 K with chemical potentials constrained to the stability window of LaAlGe (detailed in the Methods). Within that window the Ge_Al and Al_Ge enthalpies remain below 0.5 eV, which already signals high concentrations. We have revised the abstract to read 'are expected to form in considerable concentrations based on their low formation enthalpies' and added a paragraph noting the zero-temperature approximation and the absence of finite-temperature free-energy corrections. Full temperature-dependent modeling lies beyond the present scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that Ge_Al 'is donor-like, effectively electron-doping' and induces a 'substantial vertical shift of the chemical potential' is presented without reported defect concentrations, Fermi-level positions relative to the Weyl nodes, or comparison to measured carrier densities, leaving the quantitative impact on Weyl physics unsupported.

    Authors: The donor character follows directly from the formation-energy versus Fermi-level diagrams, which show the (+/0) transition level above the valence-band maximum. We do not compute explicit concentrations or the resulting E_F shift in this work. We have therefore revised the abstract to replace 'substantial vertical shift' with 'may induce a vertical shift of the chemical potential' and removed the word 'effectively'. A quantitative link to experimental carrier densities would require additional supercell statistics and direct comparison with transport data, which we flag as future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from independent DFT total-energy calculations

full rationale

The paper reports hybrid-DFT computations of defect formation enthalpies from total-energy differences for vacancies and antisites in LaAlGe. These are first-principles quantities evaluated at fixed chemical potentials and 0 K; the claim that low E_f implies high concentration during growth is an interpretive step, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no self-citation chains are load-bearing for the central results, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks (standard DFT defect methodology) and receives score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of hybrid DFT formation enthalpies and the direct mapping from zero-temperature enthalpy to growth-time concentration; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Hybrid density functional theory yields reliable defect formation enthalpies for this class of intermetallic compounds.
    Invoked when the paper states that low formation enthalpy implies considerable concentration during growth.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5753 in / 1209 out tokens · 22383 ms · 2026-05-24T04:35:22.962039+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. A. Yang, SPIN 06, 1640003 (2016), URL https:// doi.org/10.1142/S2010324716400038

    work page doi:10.1142/s2010324716400038 2016

  2. [2]

    Wang and D

    X. Wang and D. Sun, Light: Science & Applica- tions 12, 53 (2023), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41377-023-01100-x

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018), URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015001

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015001 2018

  4. [4]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.82.3045

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nature Materials 6, 183 (2007), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat1849 2007

  6. [6]

    S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, N. Alidoust, M. Neupane, G. Bian, C. Zhang, R. Sankar, G. Chang, Z. Yuan, C.- C. Lee, et al., Science 349, 613 (2015), URL https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9297

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaa9297 2015

  7. [7]

    R. D. Y. Hills, A. Kusmartseva, and F. V. Kusmartsev, Phys. Rev. B 95, 214103 (2017), URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.214103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.214103 2017

  8. [8]

    Yesilyurt, S

    C. Yesilyurt, S. G. Tan, G. Liang, and M. B. A. Jalil, Scientific Reports 6, 38862 (2016), URL https://doi. org/10.1038/srep38862

    work page doi:10.1038/srep38862 2016

  9. [9]

    Hou, Y.-F

    Z. Hou, Y.-F. Zhou, N.-X. Yang, and Q.-F. Sun, Commu- nications Physics 2, 86 (2019), URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s42005-019-0186-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-019-0186-9 2019

  10. [10]

    C. Guo, V. S. Asadchy, B. Zhao, and S. Fan, eLight 3, 2 (2023), URL https://doi.org/10.1186/ s43593-022-00036-w

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    B. Q. Lv, H. M. Weng, B. B. Fu, X. P. Wang, H. Miao, J. Ma, P. Richard, X. C. Huang, L. X. Zhao, G. F. Chen, et al., Phys. Rev. X 5, 031013 (2015), URL https:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.031013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.031013 2015

  12. [12]

    N. P. Ong and S. Liang, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 394 (2021), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s42254-021-00310-9

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    S.-Y. Xu, N. Alidoust, G. Chang, H. Lu, B. Singh, I. Belopolski, D. S. Sanchez, X. Zhang, G. Bian, H. Zheng, et al., Science Advances 3, e1603266 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1603266, URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ sciadv.1603266

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1603266 2017

  14. [14]

    Impurity spectra of graphene unde r electric and magnetic fields

    H. Hodovanets, C. J. Eckberg, P. Y. Zavalij, H. Kim, W.-C. Lin, M. Zic, D. J. Campbell, J. S. Higgins, and J. Paglione, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245132 (2018), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 98.245132

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 2018

  15. [15]

    Z. Hu, Q. Du, Y. Liu, D. Graf, and C. Petrovic, Applied Physics Letters 117, 222410 (2020), URL https://doi. org/10.1063/5.0035445

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0035445 2020

  16. [16]

    Y. G. Yu, X. Zhang, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 95, 085201 (2017), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.085201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.085201 2017

  17. [17]

    H. Kim, K. Wang, Y. Nakajima, R. Hu, S. Ziemak, P. Syers, L. Wang, H. Hodovanets, J. D. Denlinger, P. M. R. Brydon, et al., Science Advances 4, eaao4513 (2018), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aao4513, URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ sciadv.aao4513

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao4513 2018

  18. [18]

    H. Kim, J. Lee, H. Hodovanets, K. Wang, J. D. Sau, and J. Paglione, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033169 (2022), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.4.033169

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Alkauskas, J

    A. Alkauskas, J. L. Lyons, D. Steiauf, and C. G. Van de Walle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 267401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Alkauskas, M

    A. Alkauskas, M. D. McCluskey, and C. G. Van de Walle, Journal of Applied Physics 119, 181101 (2016), ISSN 0021-8979, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4948245/15179175/181101 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948245

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4948245/15179175/181101 2016

  21. [21]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006)

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    work page 1994

  24. [24]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13115 (1993)

    work page 1993

  25. [25]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/ for more details

    work page

  26. [26]

    J. M. Tomczak, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 592, 012055 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    S. Choi, A. Kutepov, K. Haule, M. van Schilfgaarde, and G. Kotliar, npj Quantum Mater. 1, 16001 (2016), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/npjquantmats.2016.1

    work page doi:10.1038/npjquantmats.2016.1 2016

  28. [28]

    S. Choi, P. Semon, B. Kang, A. Kutepov, and G. Kotliar, Comput. Phys. Commun. 244, 277 (2019), ISSN 0010- 4655, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0010465519302140

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Kutepov, V

    A. Kutepov, V. Oudovenko, and G. Kotliar, Com- put. Phys. Commun. 219, 407 (2017), ISSN 0010- 4655, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0010465517301947

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Kutepov, K

    A. Kutepov, K. Haule, S. Y. Savrasov, and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 85, 155129 (2012), URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155129

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.155129 2012

  31. [31]

    Georges , author G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996), URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.13 1996

  32. [32]

    Metzner and D

    W. Metzner and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 324 (1989), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.62.324

    work page 1989

  33. [33]

    Georges and G

    A. Georges and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 45, 6479 (1992), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.45.6479

    work page 1992

  34. [34]

    C. G. Van de Walle and J. Neugebauer, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 3851 (2004)

    work page 2004

  35. [35]

    Cordfunke and R

    E. Cordfunke and R. Konings, Thermochim. Acta 375, 65 (2001)

    work page 2001

  36. [36]

    Chase Jr., NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables , 4th ed

    M.W. Chase Jr., NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables , 4th ed. (AIP, 1998)

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    Cheng and A

    J. Cheng and A. Navrotsky, J. Mater. Res. 18, 2501 (2003)

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  39. [39]

    A. M. Guloy and J. D. Corbett, Inorganic Chemistry 30, 4789 (1991), https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00025a021, URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00025a021

    work page doi:10.1021/ic00025a021 1991

  40. [40]

    S. Y. Xu, N. Alidoust, G. Chang, H. Lu, B. Singh, I. Be- lopolski, D. S. Sanchez, X. Zhang, G. Bian, H. Zheng, et al., Science Advances 3 (2017), ISSN 2375-2548, URL https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1473922

    work page arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    W. Cao, N. Zhao, C. Pei, Q. Wang, Q. Zhang, T. Ying, Y. Zhao, L. Gao, C. Li, N. Yu, et al., Phys. Rev. B 8 105, 174502 (2022), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.174502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.174502 2022

  42. [42]

    C. J. Howard, B. J. Kennedy, and B. C. Chakoumakos, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, 349 (2000)

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    Siddiquee, C

    H. Siddiquee, C. Broyles, E. Kotta, S. Liu, S. Peng, T. Kong, B. Kang, Q. Zhu, Y. Lee, L. Ke, et al., Nat. Commun. 14, 527 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    B. Kang, Y. Lee, L. Ke, H. Kim, and M.-H. Kim, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08003 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    B. Kang, S. Choi, and H. Kim, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 64 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    B. Kang, H. Kim, Q. Zhu, and C. H. Park, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 4 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    B. Kang, C. Melnick, P. Semon, S. Ryee, M. J. Han, G. Kotliar, and S. Choi, npj Quantum Mater. 8, 35 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Kang and S

    B. Kang and S. Choi, arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05643 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1908

  49. [49]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, J. Appl. Cryst.44, 1272 (2011)

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    Z. Hu, Q. Du, Y. Liu, D. Graf, and C. Petro- vic, Applied Physics Letters 117, 222410 (2020), ISSN 0003-6951, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0035445/14542783/222410 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0035445

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0035445/14542783/222410 2020