REVIEW 1 cited by
Photonics for Sustainable Computing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Photonic integrated circuits are finding use in a variety of applications including optical transceivers, LIDAR, bio-sensing, photonic quantum computing, and Machine Learning (ML). In particular, with the exponentially increasing sizes of ML models, photonics-based accelerators are getting special attention as a sustainable solution because they can perform ML inferences with multiple orders of magnitude higher energy efficiency than CMOS-based accelerators. However, recent studies have shown that hardware manufacturing and infrastructure contribute significantly to the carbon footprint of computing devices, even surpassing the emissions generated during their use. For example, the manufacturing process accounts for 74% of the total carbon emissions from Apple in 2019. This prompts us to ask -- if we consider both the embodied (manufacturing) and operational carbon cost of photonics, is it indeed a viable avenue for a sustainable future? So, in this paper, we build a carbon footprint model for photonic chips and investigate the sustainability of photonics-based accelerators by conducting a case study on ADEPT, a photonics-based accelerator for deep neural network inference. Our analysis shows that photonics can reduce both operational and embodied carbon footprints with its high energy efficiency and at least 4$\times$ less fabrication carbon cost per unit area than 28 nm CMOS.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Toward Lifelong-Sustainable Electronic-Photonic AI Systems via Extreme Efficiency, Reconfigurability, and Robustness
Photonic-electronic AI accelerators can amortize embodied carbon across longer, more flexible lifetimes if co-designed for efficiency and reconfigurability.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.