Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

State of practice: evaluating GPU performance of state vector and tensor network methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.06188 v2 pith:TY4JVFZI submitted 2024-01-11 quant-ph cs.DC

classification quant-phcs.DC
keywords quantumsimulationperformancestatetensornetworkvectoravailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The frontier of quantum computing (QC) simulation on classical hardware is quickly reaching the hard scalability limits for computational feasibility. Nonetheless, there is still a need to simulate large quantum systems classically, as the Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices are yet to be considered fault tolerant and performant enough in terms of operations per second. Each of the two main exact simulation techniques, state vector and tensor network simulators, boasts specific limitations. The exponential memory requirement of state vector simulation, when compared to the qubit register sizes of currently available quantum computers, quickly saturates the capacity of the top HPC machines currently available. Tensor network contraction approaches, which encode quantum circuits into tensor networks and then contract them over an output bit string to obtain its probability amplitude, still fall short of the inherent complexity of finding an optimal contraction path, which maps to a max-cut problem on a dense mesh, a notably NP-hard problem. This article aims at investigating the limits of current state-of-the-art simulation techniques on a test bench made of eight widely used quantum subroutines, each in 31 different configurations, with special emphasis on performance. We then correlate the performance measures of the simulators with the metrics that characterise the benchmark circuits, identifying the main reasons behind the observed performance trend. From our observations, given the structure of a quantum circuit and the number of qubits, we highlight how to select the best simulation strategy, obtaining a speedup of up to an order of magnitude.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Intelligence-Guided Adaptive Purification for DDoS-Resilient Quantum Networks: A CUDA-Q based Study

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    IDS-driven adaptive purification in a simulated 8-node quantum repeater chain restores fidelity-qualified entanglement delivery under SSDP-induced degradation (0.098 to 0.344 above-target; oracle 0.335).

  2. GPU-Accelerated Distributed QAOA on Large-scale HPC Ecosystems

    cs.DC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    GPU-accelerated DQAOA with impact-factor based decomposition runs up to 10x faster than CPU simulations on Frontier, with better scaling up to 160 devices.

Pith tools