Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Two rest-frame wavelength measurements of galaxy sizes at $z<1$: the evolutionary effects of emerging bulges and quenched newcomers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.06842 v1 pith:MPRVIDFW submitted 2024-01-12 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
keywords sfgssizemassgalaxieslightgrowthnewcomersrest-frame
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We analyze the size evolution of $16000$ star-forming galaxies (SFGs) and $5000$ quiescent galaxies (QGs) with mass $M_*>10^{9.5}M_\odot$ at $0.1<z<0.9$ from the COSMOS field using deep CLAUDS+HSC imaging in two rest-frame wavelengths, $3000$\r{A} (UV light) and $5000$\r{A} (visible light). With half-light radius ($R_e$) as proxy for size, SFGs at characteristic mass $M_0 = 5\times10^{10}M_\odot$ grow by $20\%$ ($30\%$) in UV (visible) light since $z\sim1$ and the strength of their size evolution increases with stellar mass. After accounting for mass growth due to star formation, we estimate that SFGs grow by $75\%$ in all stellar mass bins and in both rest-frame wavelengths. Redder SFGs are more massive, smaller and more concentrated than bluer SFGs and the fraction of red SFGs increases with time. These results point to the emergence of bulges as the dominant mechanism for the average size growth of SFGs. We find two threshold values for the stellar mass density within central $1$kpc (${\Sigma}_1$): all SFGs with $\log{\Sigma}_1 > 9$ are red and only QGs have $\log{\Sigma}_1>9.7$. The size of $M_*=M_0$ QGs grows by $50\%$ ($110\%$) in the UV (visible) light. Up to $\sim20\%$ of this increase in size of massive QGs is due to newcomers (recently quenched galaxies). However, newcomers cannot explain the observed pace in the size growth of QGs; that trend has to be dominated by processes affecting individual galaxies, such as minor mergers and accretion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools