REVIEW 2 cited by
PUB: A Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark for Assessing LLMs' Pragmatics Capabilities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
LLMs have demonstrated remarkable capability for understanding semantics, but they often struggle with understanding pragmatics. To demonstrate this fact, we release a Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark (PUB) dataset consisting of fourteen tasks in four pragmatics phenomena, namely, Implicature, Presupposition, Reference, and Deixis. We curated high-quality test sets for each task, consisting of Multiple Choice Question Answers (MCQA). PUB includes a total of 28k data points, 6.1k of which have been created by us, and the rest are adapted from existing datasets. We evaluated nine models varying in the number of parameters and type of training. Our study indicates that fine-tuning for instruction-following and chat significantly enhances the pragmatics capabilities of smaller language models. However, for larger models, the base versions perform comparably with their chat-adapted counterparts. Additionally, there is a noticeable performance gap between human capabilities and model capabilities. Furthermore, unlike the consistent performance of humans across various tasks, the models demonstrate variability in their proficiency, with performance levels fluctuating due to different hints and the complexities of tasks within the same dataset. Overall, the benchmark aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of LLM's ability to handle real-world language tasks that require pragmatic reasoning.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ChronoLens: Measuring Language Change Across Time, Languages, and Linguistic Levels
ChronoLens uses feature-aligned crosscoders to show that historical language change has comparable magnitude across linguistic levels within a language, but divergent timing and direction across five parliamentary languages.
-
QUENCH: Measuring the gap between Indic and Non-Indic Contextual General Reasoning in LLMs
QUENCH introduces a generation-based quiz benchmark with masked entities and rationales, and documents a consistent Indic-versus-non-Indic performance gap across seven LLMs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.