REVIEW 2 cited by
Revisiting Demonstration Selection Strategies in In-Context Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown an impressive ability to perform a wide range of tasks using in-context learning (ICL), where a few examples are used to describe a task to the model. However, the performance of ICL varies significantly with the choice of demonstrations, and it is still unclear why this happens or what factors will influence its choice. In this work, we first revisit the factors contributing to this variance from both data and model aspects, and find that the choice of demonstration is both data- and model-dependent. We further proposed a data- and model-dependent demonstration selection method, \textbf{TopK + ConE}, based on the assumption that \textit{the performance of a demonstration positively correlates with its contribution to the model's understanding of the test samples}, resulting in a simple and effective recipe for ICL. Empirically, our method yields consistent improvements in both language understanding and generation tasks with different model scales. Further analyses confirm that, besides the generality and stability under different circumstances, our method provides a unified explanation for the effectiveness of previous methods. Code will be released.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Surprise Calibration for Better In-Context Learning
Surprise Calibration uses the model's own surprise at each demonstration's label to dynamically correct class priors in in-context learning, improving accuracy on eight NLP benchmarks.
-
Adaptive Task Vectors for Large Language Models
Adaptive Task Vectors use a small model to generate query-specific steering vectors for frozen LLMs, reporting strong accuracy and generalization, though the theoretical equivalences to LoRA and Prefix-Tuning are not ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.