REVIEW 3 cited by
Benchmarking LLMs via Uncertainty Quantification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The proliferation of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) from various institutions has highlighted the urgent need for comprehensive evaluation methods. However, current evaluation platforms, such as the widely recognized HuggingFace open LLM leaderboard, neglect a crucial aspect -- uncertainty, which is vital for thoroughly assessing LLMs. To bridge this gap, we introduce a new benchmarking approach for LLMs that integrates uncertainty quantification. Our examination involves nine LLMs (LLM series) spanning five representative natural language processing tasks. Our findings reveal that: I) LLMs with higher accuracy may exhibit lower certainty; II) Larger-scale LLMs may display greater uncertainty compared to their smaller counterparts; and III) Instruction-finetuning tends to increase the uncertainty of LLMs. These results underscore the significance of incorporating uncertainty in the evaluation of LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Uncertainty-Aware Complex Scientific Table Data Extraction
Applying conformal prediction to TSR+OCR outputs flags incorrect table cells; the paper reports 53% labor savings and a 30-point accuracy gain, but the flagging threshold is fitted to the test data.
-
PARC: A Quantitative Framework Uncovering the Symmetries within Vision Language Models
PARC measures prompt sensitivity in VLMs, showing semantic changes hurt most and InternVL2 models are most robust.
-
Is Your Model Fairly Certain? Uncertainty-Aware Fairness Evaluation for LLMs
UCerF scores LLM fairness by both correctness and confidence, and SynthBias provides 31,756 gender-occupation coreference samples for benchmark testing.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.