Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Supporting Sensemaking of Large Language Model Outputs at Scale

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.13726 v1 pith:5J544Z33 submitted 2024-01-24 cs.HC cs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.LG
keywords featurestasksdesignlanguagelargemakeoutputsresponses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are capable of generating multiple responses to a single prompt, yet little effort has been expended to help end-users or system designers make use of this capability. In this paper, we explore how to present many LLM responses at once. We design five features, which include both pre-existing and novel methods for computing similarities and differences across textual documents, as well as how to render their outputs. We report on a controlled user study (n=24) and eight case studies evaluating these features and how they support users in different tasks. We find that the features support a wide variety of sensemaking tasks and even make tasks previously considered to be too difficult by our participants now tractable. Finally, we present design guidelines to inform future explorations of new LLM interfaces.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MultEval: Supporting Collaborative Alignment for LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation Criteria

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    MultEval supports collaborative creation of LLM-as-a-judge criteria by surfacing disagreements via consensus-building methods, allowing iterative revisions with examples and history, and keeping transparent how human ...

  2. Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptions

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Surfacing variations across multiple MLLM image descriptions increases blind and low vision users' detection of unreliable claims and reduces their over-trust in a single AI description.

Pith tools