Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A2C: A Modular Multi-stage Collaborative Decision Framework for Human-AI Teams

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.14432 v1 pith:M46XGLHX submitted 2024-01-25 cs.HC cs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.LG
keywords collaborativedecision-makinghuman-aiteamsexpertsframeworkhumancomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces A2C, a multi-stage collaborative decision framework designed to enable robust decision-making within human-AI teams. Drawing inspiration from concepts such as rejection learning and learning to defer, A2C incorporates AI systems trained to recognise uncertainty in their decisions and defer to human experts when needed. Moreover, A2C caters to scenarios where even human experts encounter limitations, such as in incident detection and response in cyber Security Operations Centres (SOC). In such scenarios, A2C facilitates collaborative explorations, enabling collective resolution of complex challenges. With support for three distinct decision-making modes in human-AI teams: Automated, Augmented, and Collaborative, A2C offers a flexible platform for developing effective strategies for human-AI collaboration. By harnessing the strengths of both humans and AI, it significantly improves the efficiency and effectiveness of complex decision-making in dynamic and evolving environments. To validate A2C's capabilities, we conducted extensive simulative experiments using benchmark datasets. The results clearly demonstrate that all three modes of decision-making can be effectively supported by A2C. Most notably, collaborative exploration by (simulated) human experts and AI achieves superior performance compared to AI in isolation, underscoring the framework's potential to enhance decision-making within human-AI teams.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modeling Distinct Human Interaction in Web Agents

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new corpus and fine-tuned language models predict when web-agent users will intervene, with a small user study reporting 26.5% higher perceived usefulness.

  2. ContextBuddy: AI-Enhanced Contextual Insights for Security Alert Investigation (Applied to Intrusion Detection)

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ContextBuddy trains an imitation-learning assistant on RL-simulated analysts' context requests and shows its suggestions improve alert classification accuracy and speed in simulation and a small non-expert user study.

Pith tools