Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Speed-up for Helsgaun's TSP Heuristic by Relaxing the Positive Gain Criterion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.16149 v1 pith:2NKEY7EV submitted 2024-01-29 math.OC cs.DMcs.DSmath.CO

classification math.OCcs.DMcs.DSmath.CO
keywords instancesalternatingcriterionfindgainimprovementpositivecircles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) is one of the most extensively researched and widely applied combinatorial optimization problems. It is NP-hard even in the symmetric and metric case. Building upon elaborate research, state-of-the-art exact solvers such as CONCORDE can solve TSP instances with several ten thousand vertices. A key ingredient for these integer programming approaches are fast heuristics to find a good initial solution, in particular the Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun (LKH) heuristic. For instances with few hundred vertices heuristics like LKH often find an optimal solution. In this work we develop variations of LKH that perform significantly better on large instances. LKH repeatedly improves an initially random tour by exchanging edges along alternating circles. Thereby, it respects several criteria designed to quickly find alternating circles that give a feasible improvement of the tour. Among those criteria, the positive gain criterion stayed mostly untouched in previous research. It requires that, while constructing an alternating circle, the total gain has to be positive after each pair of edges. We relax this criterion carefully leading to improvement steps hitherto undiscovered by LKH. We confirm this improvement experimentally via extensive simulations on various benchmark libraries for TSP. Our computational study shows that for large instances our method is on average 13% faster than the latest version of LKH.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools