REVIEW 2 cited by
Deductive Beam Search: Decoding Deducible Rationale for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements have significantly augmented the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through various methodologies, especially chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. However, previous methods fail to address reasoning errors in intermediate steps, leading to accumulative errors. In this paper, we propose Deductive Beam Search (DBS), which seamlessly integrates CoT and deductive reasoning with step-wise beam search for LLMs. Our approach deploys a verifier, verifying the deducibility of a reasoning step and its premises, thus alleviating the error accumulation. Furthermore, we introduce a scalable and labor-free data construction method to amplify our model's verification capabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly enhances the base performance of LLMs of various scales (7B, 13B, 70B, and ChatGPT) across 8 reasoning datasets from 3 diverse reasoning genres, including arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic. Moreover, our analysis proves DBS's capability of detecting diverse and subtle reasoning errors and robustness on different model scales.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Theoretical Benefit and Limitation of Diffusion Language Model
Masked diffusion language models have a metric-dependent efficiency tradeoff: near-optimal perplexity in constant steps, but sequence-level correctness needs linearly many steps in the worst case.
-
Reflection-Window Decoding: Text Generation with Selective Refinement
Selectively refining uncertain windows during decoding improves text quality over greedy and beam search, with a theory formalizing why greedy decoding can miss the joint-probability-optimal response.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.