Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Distractor Generation in Multiple-Choice Tasks: A Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01512 v2 pith:PRCX3MJB submitted 2024-02-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords methodsquestionsdistractorgenerationtaskbenchmarksdatasetsdistractors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The distractor generation task focuses on generating incorrect but plausible options for objective questions such as fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice questions. This task is widely utilized in educational settings across various domains and subjects. The effectiveness of these questions in assessments relies on the quality of the distractors, as they challenge examinees to select the correct answer from a set of misleading options. The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transitioned the task from traditional methods to the use of neural networks and pre-trained language models. This shift has established new benchmarks and expanded the use of advanced deep learning methods in generating distractors. This survey explores distractor generation tasks, datasets, methods, and current evaluation metrics for English objective questions, covering both text-based and multi-modal domains. It also evaluates existing AI models and benchmarks and discusses potential future research directions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Clinical Multiple-Choice Questions Benchmarks with Knowledge Graph Guided Distractor Generation

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    KGGDG generates harder distractors for medical MCQs by walking a knowledge graph to find misleading paths and feeding them to an LLM, lowering LLM accuracy on most benchmarks tested.

Pith tools