Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Time-Varying Gaussian Process Bandits with Unknown Prior

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01632 v4 pith:QRRSGRNT submitted 2024-02-02 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords prioralgorithmfunctionpriorstime-varyingbayesiancaseoptimisation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Bayesian optimisation requires fitting a Gaussian process model, which in turn requires specifying prior on the unknown black-box function -- most of the theoretical literature assumes this prior is known. However, it is common to have more than one possible prior for a given black-box function, for example suggested by domain experts with differing opinions. In some cases, the type-II maximum likelihood estimator for selecting prior enjoys the consistency guarantee, but it does not universally apply to all types of priors. If the problem is stationary, one could rely on the Regret Balancing scheme to conduct the optimisation, but in the case of time-varying problems, such a scheme cannot be used. To address this gap in existing research, we propose a novel algorithm, PE-GP-UCB, which is capable of solving time-varying Bayesian optimisation problems even without the exact knowledge of the function's prior. The algorithm relies on the fact that either the observed function values are consistent with some of the priors, in which case it is easy to reject the wrong priors, or the observations are consistent with all candidate priors, in which case it does not matter which prior our model relies on. We provide a regret bound on the proposed algorithm. Finally, we empirically evaluate our algorithm on toy and real-world time-varying problems and show that it outperforms the maximum likelihood estimator, fully Bayesian treatment of unknown prior and Regret Balancing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Statistical Multicriteria Evaluation of LLM-Generated Text

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using generalized stochastic dominance, the authors find that human-written text completions are not significantly outperformed by five LLM decoding strategies across mixed cardinal and ordinal quality metrics.

  2. Wasserstein Barycenter Gaussian Process based Bayesian Optimization

    stat.ML 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    WBGP-BO combines multiple Gaussian processes with prefixed hyperparameters by averaging their means and standard deviations, and outperforms vanilla GP-based Bayesian optimization on several one-dimensional test problems.

Pith tools