REVIEW 4 cited by
CodeAgent: Autonomous Communicative Agents for Code Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Code review, which aims at ensuring the overall quality and reliability of software, is a cornerstone of software development. Unfortunately, while crucial, Code review is a labor-intensive process that the research community is looking to automate. Existing automated methods rely on single input-output generative models and thus generally struggle to emulate the collaborative nature of code review. This work introduces \tool{}, a novel multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) system for code review automation. CodeAgent incorporates a supervisory agent, QA-Checker, to ensure that all the agents' contributions address the initial review question. We evaluated CodeAgent on critical code review tasks: (1) detect inconsistencies between code changes and commit messages, (2) identify vulnerability introductions, (3) validate code style adherence, and (4) suggest code revision. The results demonstrate CodeAgent's effectiveness, contributing to a new state-of-the-art in code review automation. Our data and code are publicly available (\url{https://github.com/Code4Agent/codeagent}).
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Reinforce LLM Reasoning through Multi-Agent Reflection
DPSDP trains an actor-critic LLM pair with DPO-style preference learning on self-generated trajectories, improving iterative refinement accuracy on math benchmarks.
-
DPO-F+: Aligning Code Repair Feedback with Developers' Preferences
DPO-f+ fine-tunes LLMs with reward-augmented DPO to generate developer-profile-aware code-repair feedback, claiming gains over DPO that rest on LLM-judge evaluations.
-
Agentic AI Systems Applied to tasks in Financial Services: Modeling and model risk management crews
A CrewAI-based multi-agent system with human oversight built financial models and carried out model risk management checks on three public credit datasets, with results comparable to AutoML and Kaggle baselines.
-
LLM-Based Agentic Systems for Software Engineering: Challenges and Opportunities
A survey of LLM-based multi-agent systems across the software development life cycle, plus a research agenda for orchestration, human coordination, cost, and data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.