Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

RACER: An LLM-powered Methodology for Scalable Analysis of Semi-structured Mental Health Interviews

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02656 v1 pith:PZAWVNPT submitted 2024-02-05 cs.CL q-bio.QM

classification cs.CLq-bio.QM
keywords racerssisanalysishealthcarehumanresearchagreementchallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Semi-structured interviews (SSIs) are a commonly employed data-collection method in healthcare research, offering in-depth qualitative insights into subject experiences. Despite their value, the manual analysis of SSIs is notoriously time-consuming and labor-intensive, in part due to the difficulty of extracting and categorizing emotional responses, and challenges in scaling human evaluation for large populations. In this study, we develop RACER, a Large Language Model (LLM) based expert-guided automated pipeline that efficiently converts raw interview transcripts into insightful domain-relevant themes and sub-themes. We used RACER to analyze SSIs conducted with 93 healthcare professionals and trainees to assess the broad personal and professional mental health impacts of the COVID-19 crisis. RACER achieves moderately high agreement with two human evaluators (72%), which approaches the human inter-rater agreement (77%). Interestingly, LLMs and humans struggle with similar content involving nuanced emotional, ambivalent/dialectical, and psychological statements. Our study highlights the opportunities and challenges in using LLMs to improve research efficiency and opens new avenues for scalable analysis of SSIs in healthcare research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Requirements Elicitation Follow-Up Question Generation

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GPT-4o-generated follow-up questions are rated equal to human questions when minimally guided, and better when guided by a 14-type interviewer mistake framework.

Pith tools