Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fine-tuning Reinforcement Learning Models is Secretly a Forgetting Mitigation Problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02868 v3 pith:UM7G25HQ submitted 2024-02-05 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords fine-tuningmodelscapabilitiespre-trainedproblemtransferforgettinglearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Fine-tuning is a widespread technique that allows practitioners to transfer pre-trained capabilities, as recently showcased by the successful applications of foundation models. However, fine-tuning reinforcement learning (RL) models remains a challenge. This work conceptualizes one specific cause of poor transfer, accentuated in the RL setting by the interplay between actions and observations: forgetting of pre-trained capabilities. Namely, a model deteriorates on the state subspace of the downstream task not visited in the initial phase of fine-tuning, on which the model behaved well due to pre-training. This way, we lose the anticipated transfer benefits. We identify conditions when this problem occurs, showing that it is common and, in many cases, catastrophic. Through a detailed empirical analysis of the challenging NetHack and Montezuma's Revenge environments, we show that standard knowledge retention techniques mitigate the problem and thus allow us to take full advantage of the pre-trained capabilities. In particular, in NetHack, we achieve a new state-of-the-art for neural models, improving the previous best score from $5$K to over $10$K points in the Human Monk scenario.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Latent Activation Editing: Inference-Time Refinement of Learned Policies for Safer Multirobot Navigation

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Editing a frozen RL policy's latent activations at inference time, using a collision world model, cuts collisions by about 90% on a curated set of hard multirotor scenarios and on real Crazyflies.

  2. From Seeing to Experiencing: Scaling Navigation Foundation Models with Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Pretraining a navigation foundation model on videos and then fine-tuning only a residual attention module with reinforcement learning improves success rate and collision avoidance compared to behavior cloning or super...

Pith tools